Jump to content

Talk:Geographic information science

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jeansoulin (talk | contribs) at 14:41, 29 February 2012 (Distinction without a difference: much too many discrepencies covering a single scientific domain !). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMaps Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

incorrect capitalisation

I changed the capitalisation of the lemma (and of geographic information system) to correspond to other sciences (and general spelling rules for common/proper nouns). It wouldn't be correct to capitalise "physics" or "theory of relativity" either. BTW, it's confusing for non-experts that according to the name it's a science, but the article calls it a theory. --Espoo 12:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information

Good start. In addition, consider adding link(s) and/or various addedums related to information science (IS) - moreover, research topics w/in IS that the existing entry for Geographic Information Science loosely touches on already; for example:

relevance / precicion vs. recall / information seeking behavior / cognitive modeling of the user / information visualization

Just brainstorming, but those can all be applied to this entry in some meaningful fashion. Thanks, and keep up the good work!

Distinction without a difference

I'm afraid that GeoComputation is not really different, but a different definition of Geographic Information Systems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.130.100 (talk) 21:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't agree from my very limited knowledge. GeoComputation may or may not involve a GIS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.150.108.37 (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answer and proposition. The most commonly and widely accepted term of Geomatics should cover both Geoinformatics and Geocomputation, and probably Geographic information science. A merge of all those articles, which are not very dense anyway, could reasonably be a common ground for the four names. Slight differences could be mentioned in a special paragraphs (I'll think about a version of it). All the folks in these domains are meeting in the same conferences! The fact that -as the above anonymous- GIS are or not involved, doesnt matter to the underlying science and tech. But GIS should keep their own entry in the encyclopedia, as a technology used in Geomatics. Moreover, the status of Geomatics engineering seems unclear, as it is a mere list of the technologies used in Geomatics. It could become a section of the new article. Jeansoulin (talk) 14:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]