Jump to content

Talk:Pelanechinus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BarbBarbBarb (talk | contribs) at 17:18, 30 December 2012 (The hook is not good). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPalaeontology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The hook is not good

This hook is written as if this is a characteristic of the species, while the article is about the genus, and the flexible test is probably the most well known characteristic for distinguishing the order. --BarbBarbBarb (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(From my talk page) I noticed your comment on the talk page of Pelanechinus where you stated that you thought the DYK hook was not good. It was not the original hook that I suggested and you can see the discussion that went on to decide on the wording of the hook here. A DYK hook is supposed to be interesting, and to most people, the flexibility of the test might be interesting. The fact that it applies to all the members of the order Echinothurioida does not make it any less true of individual members. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
You shouldn't mislead readers and use a hook that implies that this is a unique characteristic of the species when it is not. An encyclopedia should inform the reader, not mislead them. --BarbBarbBarb (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]