User talk:Nightocean
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Nightocean, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Nightocean! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Sources must actually support the content attributed to them
Your recent edit [1] inserted a source published in May purporting to support claims of box office gross for a movie that was not released until August. Either you were careless and inserted the wrong citation by accident or you were attempting to willfully deceive. Either one is problematic. Please be more careful. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kammath & Kammath. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You need to stop reinserting unsourced and improperly sourced content to articles. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Siva's Untitled Project for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siva's Untitled Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siva's Untitled Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Repost of Leela (2013 film)
A tag has been placed on Leela (2013 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- You may find a copy of the article at the Article Incubation area: Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Leela (2013 film) - Nabla (talk) 22:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Repost of Mr. Fraud
A tag has been placed on Mr. Fraud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Content requires sources
Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dulquer Salmaan seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dulquer_Salmaan with this edit. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dulquer_Salmaan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You keep reinstating this content [2] without providing a reliable source. You must stop. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 08:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia only uses film reviews from professional critics
Wikipedia only uses film reviews from professional critics. Please stop re- inserting non professional reviews such as cinnecurry. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 08:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)