Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 27

< February 26	February 28 >

February 27

File:SecretTakeYouHome.jpg

Violation of WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laut Gedacht (Basic Version).jpg

File:Laut Gedacht (Standard Version).jpg

File:Laut Gedacht (Premium Edition).jpg

WP:NFCC 3a. There are such trivial differences that it could not be considered "minimal use". I suggest deletion of these 3 images, and only File:Silbermond-laut gedacht.jpg should remain in the article (Laut Gedacht). James086^Talk 15:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitechapel-TheSomaticDefilementreissue.jpg

Violation of WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minimal usage? It is the alternate art for an album. Almost every album article has this. The Flood (Of Mice & Men album) and Numbers (Woe, Is Me album) being two prime examples. And those have never got this warning. The art shows the different cover for the upcoming re-release of the album and does not reflect upon previous versions and therefore, does not fall under WP:NFCC#3a. XyphynX9 (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"A file with a valid non-free-use rationale for some (but not all) articles it is used in will not be deleted. Instead, the file should be removed from the articles for which it lacks a non-free-use rationale, or a suitable rationale added." Taken straight from the enforcement section below. XyphynX9 (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- For the other two articles you mentioned, see WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferns, by Cleo Hartwig. Smithsonian American Art Museum.jpg

Photo of a seemingly random artwork by an American artist, used for showing an example of the artist's works. Searching for the artist's name at www.copyright.gov, I can't find any copyright renewal registrations. This should mean that all works first published between 1951 and 1963 are in the public domain, so the image is replaceable by a photo of a different work. Works first published before 1951 might be protected by copyright. This requires searching for paper renewals, which is a bit more difficult. Works published after 1963 might also be published if they contain a visible copyright notice.

Additionally, there is no evidence of permission from the photographer. Photos of artworks have two copyrights: the photographer's copyright and the artist's copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheFloodReIssue.jpg

Violation of WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]