User talk:Emarsee

	Talk Page Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6

Welcome to Emarsee’s talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

If I left a message on your talk page, please post a reply to my talk page. I might be unable to see your message if you post it on your talk page.

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please post a reply here.

If you choose to not respond on my talk page, please use a talkback template, {{tb|Insert your username here}}.
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.

Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
Remember to post new messages at the bottom of my talk page.
I will not continue on with a conversation if it involves off-Wikipedia conversation. (eg, telephone, email, IM, social networking, etc.) If you have concerns that you are uncomfortable to discuss on Wikipedia, use the Email this user tool.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Thank you. █ EMARSEE

Committed identity:

3FB3924C9AC7262A08E3E690E0AD6DB62B45D76AD04E608C724D5D49288F0049 2FA311B9C5ED88DE4F98F927F34A736943D19D815DD8075216541797C476C739 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

CHCT/CHCO-TV Content

Emarsee,

Yes I do have close relationship with this station.

CHCO-TV Broadcast Certificate# T-7335 File# 6206-08476

I don't know how to change the page name to CHCO-TV.

Thanks for helping keep our information up to date.

Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnwatt (talk • contribs) 04:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fix up the City HD logo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:City_HD_logo.svg

Emarsee, care to fix this logo for me? (FreshCorp619 (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC))[reply]

It looks like you managed to embed a raster image inside a SVG file, which pretty much defeats the purpose of having an SVG file. I'll fix the logo soon though. █ EMARSEE 00:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my edit?

I am confused about what you meant in your edit description. I don't see any reason to delete what I wrote. This is about the CBC News article.

I can't exactly say the source you cited can be considered to be reliable, LifeSiteNews isn't a well established news organization and a organization linked with the CPC isn't likely able to make a unbiased decision on whether CBC's news is "liberal" or not. The site claims the CBC "has gained a firm reputation in Canada for its heavy liberal slant" without substantiating that claim. You would be better off with a source that makes mention of CBC News' alleged bias from reliable and well established news organization like The Globe and Mail or the National Post. █ EMARSEE 02:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable and well established - The Globe and Mail?

Now it's obvious to me that Wikipedia panders to the epitome of Journalistic bias and lack of journalistic integrity. http://www.canpalnet.ca/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=185&Itemid=1

Thumbnails

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ABronydoc_logo.jpg&diff=534275499&oldid=534267189 It doesn't update the most recent thumbnail until you upload a new picture for the file, and then, the most recent one takes on the appearance of the old image. I think this is a Wikipedia bug someone with more power than us needs to fix. dogman15 (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've noticed that. A forced refresh of the page normally solves the problem and generates a new thumbnail for the image. I have no idea why its only the Bronycon doc image that's problematic, but someone *really* needs to fix this. █ EMARSEE 06:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For a while, there were also problems with the display of this image's updates. dogman15 (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Dear Emarsee,

I am writing to you with reference to the contribution in which you delete from Harbour Centre. What you deem constructive and what the general public aka our guests deem as constructive may be two different things. The information was provided inform people about interesting information and views regarding the viewing deck.

(VancouverLookout (talk) 20:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

February 2013

Dear Emarsee,

I am writing to you with reference to the contribution in which you delete from Harbour Centre. What you deem constructive and what the general public aka our guests deem as constructive may be two different things. The information was provided inform people about interesting information and views regarding the viewing deck.

The information provided was just like information provided on the Space Needle page but regarding the Vancouver Lookout

(VancouverLookout (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Palm trees in BC.....

RE this edit - probably the same person obsessively tried to feature this in the Vancouverarticle, using pics of the palms on the English Bay waterfront as if they were common; and got into something of an edit war over it; I see they're back. Many trees in BC are exogenous; the monkey-puzzle comes to mind as much more visible, also the rhododendron and azalea and decorative bamboo which are very very common as you may know. The palm trees thing is jejune, someone's obsession; trying to prove that BC is "Canada's tropics" or whatever....Skookum1 (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR violation at Family Channel

I haven't reported you for this, but I thought I'd let you know that you violated WP:3RR at Family Channel by reverting 4 times in a 24-hour period. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 05:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yearbook Awards

I suppose that Eric Hamber's Yearbook awards "[don't] seem to be... notable" I wonder about Prince of Wales' Secondary's page... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Wales_Secondary_School Unless you have some sort of bias... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.209.44 (talk) 08:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No bias here. The article didn't pop on my radar (last relevant edit was in June so I might have missed it then) so no action was taken. █ EMARSEE 06:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super Channel (Canada) logo

Hello,

I'm connected with Super Channel. The logo that you've posted to the Super Channel wiki page is outdated. If we supplied you with a current logo, would you be able to replace it for us?

Thanks, Brad - Super Channel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burner21X (talk • contribs) 20:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Emarsee; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constructivity

Hey.

Could you explain what makes this not constructive?

I think it's valid if its under the subheading ==controversy==

If you could tell me how the points in this post aren't valid, or how I can make them valid to stay ON the page, that'd be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshyCrow (talk • contribs) 03:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you don't understand how Wikipedia work - content on Wikipedia needs to be neutral and verifiable. In order for a article to be verifiable, it needs to be back by reliable sources. As it currently stand, your contributions are nothing more than mere opinion and are not backed up by any sources (your blog does not count as a source). Wikipedia is not a soapbox for dissenting opinions, if this was the case, we could fill up Christy Clark's page with endless commentary on controversy x and y and distract the reader from learning about her biography or her political positions. I'll welcome your reply on this matter, but I'll be reverting your edit as its unacceptable in its current state.

I did ask how we could make these what you call, 'claims', valid. There is lots in the article that I could point to that isn't 'neutral'. For example, the article fails to show where some of the Dolphin that have been SHOWCASED at the aquarium are actually from. If you want to use google to find a website that's VERIFIABLE, please do, as there are many links that point to the fact that the Dolphin were purchased from the Futo Dolphin Drives. There is also lots of information to help someone like you, understand what sort of industry the Aquarium supported by committing to this purchase.

The contributions to this article fail to provide verifiable facts as to why its educational for an animal to be contained within 9,500,000 liters of water as opposed to living freely in the ocean. Lots of articles have controversy contrary to the official definition of the institution. Why is this so different? This isn't the only aquarium in the world that has been challenged by these ideas. BUT, it is one of only two or three aquariums in the world that hold in captivity, whales and dolphins.

And please don't compare the matters of Christy Clark's life to obvious manipulation of the public. If wikipedia is really supposed to be about INFORMING people, then people who are unaware of the inner workings of aquariums should be informed and as the aquarium likes to state, educated.

Thanks