Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of subtitle editors
- Comparison of subtitle editors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While it may be useful to have a comparison table for software used to edit subtitles, Wikipedia isn't the place for it. By definition, this is pure original research. Bfigura (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Update from nominator - While I'm not sure how this really meets WP:V without running afoul of WP:OR, I do agree that there is definitely a precedent for keeping these sort of articles. (I did my own search of past AfD's, and the list below is pretty reasonably representative). That said, this probably qualifies for a snowball close. -- Bfigura (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- keep. Why is that "by definition"? This is just a table of features, without any synthesis/conclusions by wikipedians. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- keep. Comparison of subtitle editors is a comparison like any other comparison page of other software in Wikipedia. I'll give a 100 examples:
Comparison of 3D computer graphics software
Comparison of accounting software
Comparison of ADC software
Comparison of agent-based modeling software
Comparison of Android e-book reader software
Comparison of antivirus software
Comparison of application virtualization software
Comparison of audio player software
Comparison of behavioral experiment software
Comparison of BitTorrent clients
Comparison of BitTorrent tracker software
Comparison of backup software
Comparison of brainwave entrainment software
Comparison of business integration software
Comparison of Canadian-tax preparation software for personal use
Comparison of cluster software
Comparison of computer-aided design editors
Comparison of continuous integration software
Comparison of CRM systems
Comparison of defragmentation software
Comparison of dental practice management software
Comparison of desktop publishing software
Comparison of development estimation software
Comparison of DEX software
Comparison of DHCP server software
Comparison of digital audio editors
Comparison of disc authoring software
Comparison of disc image software
Comparison of disk cloning software
Comparison of disk encryption software
Comparison of DNS server software
Comparison of EDA software
Comparison of eDonkey software
Comparison of embroidery software
Comparison of enterprise bookmarking platforms
Comparison of file archivers
Comparison of file managers
Comparison of file sharing applications
Comparison of file synchronization software
Comparison of file verification software
Comparison of firewalls
Comparison of free and open-source software licenses
Comparison of free software e-commerce web application frameworks
Comparison of FTP client software
Comparison of genealogy software
Comparison of geographic information systems software
Comparison of help desk issue tracking software
Comparison of instant messaging clients
Comparison of integrated development environments
Comparison of Internet forum software
Comparison of iOS e-book reader software
Comparison of iPod managers
Comparison of macro recorder software
Comparison of network diagram software
Comparison of neurofeedback software
Comparison of notetaking software
Comparison of numerical analysis software
Comparison of object-relational mapping software
Comparison of Office Open XML software
Comparison of open-source configuration management software
Comparison of open-source software hosting facilities
Comparison of open-source wireless drivers
Comparison of open source and closed source
Comparison of open source configuration management software
Comparison of OpenDocument software
Comparison of optical character recognition software
Comparison of optimization software
Comparison of photo gallery software
Comparison of photo stitching software
Comparison of platform virtualization software
Comparison of project management software
Comparison of property management software
Comparison of PVR software packages
Comparison of raster-to-vector conversion software
Comparison of reference management software
Comparison of remote desktop software
Comparison of revision control software
Comparison of screencasting software
Comparison of shopping cart software
Comparison of social networking software
Comparison of software and protocols for distributed social networking
Comparison of software calculators
Comparison of software saving Web pages for offline use
Comparison of spreadsheet software
Comparison of statistical packages
Comparison of structured storage software
Comparison of survey software
Comparison of time tracking software
Comparison of vector graphics editors
Comparison of video converters
Comparison of video editing software
Comparison of video player software
Comparison of vinyl emulation software
Comparison of VoIP software
Comparison of web-based genealogy software
Comparison of web conferencing software
Comparison of web server software
Comparison of webcam software
Comparison of wiki software
Comparison of XMPP server software
So Wikipedia isn't the place for all these pages? Should all these pages be deleted because their research is 'original research'? No, they just offer characteristics of the items compared. They should be kept. So the Comparison of subtitle editors page should also be kept. Jgamleus (talk) 06:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep These comparison lists are part of WP and provide valuable encyclopedic knowledge and need to be kept. scope_creep talk 23:32 7 April2014 (UTC)