Jump to content

Linear sweep voltammetry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 130.233.186.73 (talk) at 08:33, 3 June 2014 (Experimental method). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Linear potential sweep

Linear sweep voltammetry is a voltammetric method where the current at a working electrode is measured while the potential between the working electrode and a reference electrode is swept linearly in time. Oxidation or reduction of species is registered as a peak or trough in the current signal at the potential at which the species begins to be oxidized or reduced.

Experimental method

The experimental setup for linear sweep voltammetry utilizes a potentiostat and a three-electrode setup to deliver a potential to a solution and monitor its change in current. The three-electrode setup consists of a working electrode, an auxiliary electrode, and a reference electrode. The potentiostat delivers the potentials through the three-electrode setup. A potential, E, is delivered through the working electrode. The slope of the potential vs. time graph is called the scan rate and can range from mV/s to 1,000,000 V/s.[1] At higher scan rates the current is found to increase which improves the signal to noise ratio. Therefore higher scan rates lead to better signal to noise ratios.

The working electrode is where the oxidation/reduction reactions occur. The equation below gives an example of an oxidation occurring at the surface of the working electrode. ES is the standard reduction potential of A. As E approaches ES the current on the surface increases and when E=ES then the concentration of [A] = [A-] at the surface.[2] As the molecules on the surface of the working electrode are oxidized/reduced they move away from the surface and new molecules come into contact with the surface of the working electrode. This flow of molecules to and from the working electrode causes the current.

Oxidation of molecule A at the surface of the working electrode

The auxiliary and reference electrode work in unison to balance out the charge added or removed by the working electrode. The auxiliary electrode balances the working electrode, but in order to know how much potential it has to add or remove it relies on the reference electrode. The reference electrode has a known reduction potential. The auxiliary electrode tries to keep the reference electrode at a certain reduction potential and to do this it has to balance the working electrode.[3]

Characterization

Linear sweep voltammetry can identify unknown species and determine the concentration of solutions. E1/2 can be used to identify the unknown species while the height of the limiting current can determine the concentration. The sensitivity of current changes vs. voltage can be increased by increasing the scan rate. Higher potentials per second result in more oxidation/reduction of a species at the surface of the working electrode.

Variations

For reversible reactions cyclic voltammetry can be used to find information about the forward reaction and the reverse reaction. Like linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry applies a linear potential over time and at a certain potential the potentiostat will reverse the potential applied and sweep back to the beginning point. Cyclic voltammetry provides information about the oxidation and reduction reactions.

Applications

While cyclic voltammetry is applicable to most cases where linear sweep voltammetry is used, there are some instances where linear sweep voltammetry is more useful. In cases where the reaction is irreversible cyclic voltammetry will not give any additional data that linear sweep voltammetry would give us.[4] In one example,[5] linear voltammetry was used to examine direct methane production via a biocathode. Since the production of methane from CO2 is an irreversible reaction, cyclic voltammetry did not present any distinct advantage over linear sweep voltammetry. This group found that the biocathode produced higher current densities than a plain carbon cathode and that methane can be produced from a direct electrical current without the need of hydrogen gas.

See also

References

  1. ^ Tissue, Brian M. "Linear Sweep Voltammetry". CHP.
  2. ^ "Voltammetry". CHP.
  3. ^ Kounaves, Samuel P. Voltammetric Techniques. Handbook of Instrumental Techniques for Analytical Chemistry. pp. 709–725.
  4. ^ "Instrumentation, Pine Research. Linear Sweep Voltammetry". CHP. 2008.
  5. ^ Logan, Bruce E. (2009). "Direct Biological Conversion of Electrical Current into Methane by Electromethanogenesis". Environ. Sci. Technol.: 3953–3958.