User talk:Babestress

November 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Santiago de Compostela derailment because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tenerife airport disaster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tenerife airport disaster was changed by Babestress (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913619 on 2013-11-24T12:26:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Babestress, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Babestress!! We want to invite you to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game that can help you become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey, and you'll learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Come play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure

Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.

--thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Thank you.

The article Oxigen has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of [[:]]

A tag has been placed on [[:]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 13:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Egyptian Revolution of 2013 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Revolution of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolution of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GreyShark (dibra) 19:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you approve of this? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 04:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:40, Wednesday, November 13, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Nomination of Pope John Paul II National School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pope John Paul II National School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pope John Paul II National School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 14:43, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Avono. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SpySheriff, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Avono (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seabury, Ireland

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Seabury, Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop immediately edit-warring at Novofedorivka incident. The redirect has a long edit history and was made as a result of a community discussion. Please study it carefully and, if you still want to restore the text, start an RfC at the talk page. Continuing edit-warring will get your account blocked. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--Ymblanter (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of December 2014 Odessa bombings

A tag has been placed on December 2014 Odessa bombings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/513053.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kilmore, Dublin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kilmore, Dublin, Babestress!

Wikipedia editor Smirkybec just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Smirkybec's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of 2014 Ghent apartment siege

Hello, Babestress. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2014 Ghent apartment siege, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 20:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2014 Ghent apartment siege

A tag has been placed on 2014 Ghent apartment siege, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghent siege.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghent siege.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2015 Kharkiv bombing

The article 2015 Kharkiv bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A news article on a bombing in Ukraine. No reliable sources to indicate that the event is notable, and the title is also not referenced in the media, indicating original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aerospeed (Talk) 14:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2015 Kharkiv bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Kharkiv bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Kharkiv bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aerospeed (Talk) 18:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would say this is a provocation. An attack in Kharkiv that killed 4 people isn't notable? I think this article is completely notable. The above reason does not make sense. KEEP.--Babestress (talk) 17:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selina Win Pe

The article Selina Win Pe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

No source, no notability, used image is without license

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Optimale ^Gu 16:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm DAJF. An edit that you recently made to Haruna Yukawa seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DAJF (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Syrian Civil War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Islamic court, Deir ez-Zor clashes (2011–present) and Islamic State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Marseille shooting

Hello. Do you think 2015 Marseille shooting could be merged with La Castellane, since it happened there and it was just another incident/shooting happened in that neighborhood? Or will you be able to write a long separate article?Zigzig20s (talk) 10:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC) I will be able to make it longer. Thanks. --Babestress (talk) 10:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 Nice attack

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2015 Nice attack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pishcal — ♣ 19:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from 2015 Nice attack, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Dai Pritchard (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images

An image or media file has been removed from Talk:TripAdvisor because it is licensed as non-free. Wikipedia's non-free content policy states that "copyrighted images under fair use are only allowed to be used in articles about the subject of the image". It is requested that you abide by this policy and refrain from including non-free images on discussion pages. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's non-free content policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of non-free images. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Psychonaut (talk) 22:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-austerity protests in Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial assistance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Joué-lès-Tours attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Joué-lès-Tours attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Joué-lès-Tours attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Woodie's DIY

A tag has been placed on Woodie's DIY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Animalparty-- (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Selina Win Pe

A tag has been placed on Selina Win Pe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

` This is your twelkfdrtgiiiiiiiyl;b/. scarning; if you Wikipedia:Van Wikipedia again, as einstallation Environment, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editi!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:Codenam20:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Waterford Castle

A tag has been placed on Waterford Castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Well, enough is enough. You have been around for quite some time and you failed to demonstrate that you can edit constructively and at the same time not to create a lot of problems for other users. Your achievements include vandalism, edit warring, mindless controvercial moves, and, today, creation of an "article" which has one line, no references, no categories, nothing. We can not proceed like this. I suggest you find a mentor (not me) who would be willing to correct all the STUFF replacing a disgusting word with a better word(and by the way I have contacted wiki about this language and I am thinking about the police) you produce, and then file an unblock request explaining how you are going to change your editing style. Otherwise it would be better for everybody if you stay blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]