Jump to content

Talk:Paul Young

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Roman Spinner (talk | contribs) at 08:49, 21 June 2015 (→Requested move 15 June 2015: noting a rejection of one of the users' kind request to desist from submitting further WP:REQUESTED MOVES; rejection based upon the explanation that WP:PRIMARYTOPICs are chosen as the result of consensus votes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Quality

Article reads like a fluff magazine piece. Has little of the necessary tone or dignity of that of an encyclopedia entry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.21.131 (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And, offtopic, but does anyone else think the wikibiography graphic looks like Hitler without the moustache?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.21.131 (talk) 23:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Paulyoungbest.jpg

Image:Paulyoungbest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Paulyoungbest.jpg

Image:Paulyoungbest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 17:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

"Los Pacaminos" is not "Paul Young", is it? So the picture in the middle seem to be wrong! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.161.97.13 (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From http://www.paul-young.com/main.htm: "Early 1999 saw Paul getting together again with his friends in “Los Pacaminos”. They recorded a four track CD-ep that found it’s way into London’s only Country music station and their self-penned song “Shadows On The Rise” was played on heavy rotation for three months. Paul, Obviously, the next step was an album." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.15.241 (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discography

This article needs a discography section. --mwalimu59 (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. What musician doesn't have a discography section. otisjimmy1 (talk) 11:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Oh come on, somebody must have a better picture than that - one where he doesn't look as if he's taking a dump... Dom Kaos (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What fool put the link to the "Rock Swings" album to an album of a similar title by Paul Anka??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imarcopolo (talk • contribs) 02:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)  Fixed--Cactus26 (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 June 2015

– addition of parenthetical qualifier will enable subject's proper placement among 14 others named "Paul Young" at the Paul Young (disambiguation) page. The qualifier "(solo singer)" would disambiguate him (born 1956) from a nine-years-older (1947–2000) rock vocalist, Paul Young (Sad Café and Mike + The Mechanics singer). Most disambiguation pages do not have a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and there is no such need here. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 11:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. This page was viewed much more often than any other topic, and more than the others combined, as called for at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. See pageviews for May:
Thus, this page got 67.3% of the views in May - over two-thirds. The next closest topic (the Desperate Housewives character) got 12.3%. The disambiguation page itself only got 1.3%. Even if you discount the primarytopic bump in views for this topic, it still has a commanding lead. No other topic has a historical significance that would counteract the usage lead of this topic. That all adds up to a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The current setup works best for our readers and editors. Dohn joe (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, along with a request, again, that the nominator stops making requested moves until he or she has made an effort to read up on how primary topics work. This is at least the third nomination from this user in the last few weeks in which the argument for a lack of primary topic has had no support beyond personal opinion, including the soundly rejected cases at Talk:David Zimmer and Gary Williams.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I feel obligated to reject the above user's kind request regarding submissions of requested moves. Since the above user has been editing Wikipedia for some considerable amount of time, he or she should know by now that most disambiguation pages do not feature WP:PRIMARYTOPICs. Furthermore, a majority of the pages which do indicate a primary topic indicate such a topic solely at the unsubstantiated predilection of the editor who chose one of the entries as the primary topic. Moreover, as the above editor should know equally well by now, such decisions are made, at Wikipedia, as the result of a consensus. No such consensus had been previously indicated at either Gary Williams, David Zimmer or, presently, at Paul Young. It should also be added that the nomination at David Zimmer was not as "soundly rejected" as that at Gary Williams. No one, in fact, even argued that the Canadian provincial politician was a national-level figure. He was, for all intents, accepted as the "primary topic placeholder" until another "David Zimmer" becomes the subject of a Wikipedia biographical entry. I trust this reply will prove satisfactory, but in the event it does not, I will remain at future disposal to discuss this matter further. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 08:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Young&oldid=667897775"