Jump to content

Talk:Lunar Jetman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 20:20, 4 September 2015 (Transcluding GA review). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Currah

WHAT is that he says when he dies (with Currah unit enabled)? Drutt (talk) 00:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds very much like "fuck you", but I don't know what it's meant to be. Miremare 20:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is bizarre. Has anyone from Ultimate ever commented on this? 2fort5r (talk) 10:43, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon

The section on the Crash cartoon ought to be expanded. This eventually became better-known than the games. 2fort5r (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Lunar jetman replaced Jetpac at the top of the speccy charts:

http://www.worldofspectrum.org/showmag.cgi?mag=C+VG/Issue023/Pages/CVG02300037.jpg

https://archive.org/stream/computer-video-games-magazine-026/CVG026_Dec_1983#page/n212/mode/1up — Preceding unsigned comment added by SHOlafsson (talkcontribs) 18:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SHOlafsson (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lunar Jetman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'll be reviewing this article. It seems to be well written and everything is well sourced. However, I'm confused with how the infobox has a reference. Is it because that date is controversional? If not, I would suggest adding that reference to the article's body. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking this, Tintor! Some reviewers actually ask me to source release dates in the infobox, which I usually do without question, even though I don't feel it's required. I've added it to the lead for now, mainly because of the low number of references for this article. JAGUAR  22:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I already passed the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]