User talk:Amerijuanican

I've changed this block to indefinite for sockpuppetry, per the evidence supplied at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UnbiasedVictory. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited under that account in over a year, and frankly your "investigation" proves nothing else but at one point two accounts made edits on the same articles - therefore your block solely based on that reason is unjustified. This is my account and I use no other to make edits, I'd really appreciate it if other Wikipedians with more experience than me would stop using minuscule items to get me blocked because I'm adding legitimate information they don't like seeing. Amerijuanican (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amerijuanican (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was recently blocked for sockpuppetry when this is the only account I've edited under in over a year, which my contributions prove contrary to the so-called "evidence" from the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UnbiasedVictory. I'm currently serving out a 24-hour ban for the three-revert rule and have no issue with that, but I would like to be removed from the indefinitely blocked list - I've committed no sockpuppetry. Thank you for your time in viewing this request.

Decline reason:

Looking at your edits, no way this is your first account here. Max Semenik (talk) 23:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Amerijuanican (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't deny that. The aforementioned account and this one are the only ones I possess. My point was this one is the only one I've edited from in over a year (because it's my permanent account now and I don't use the other), so I couldn't have possibly committed sockpuppetry. Look at my contributions, there's no evidence to support it. I was accused of this once before and was ultimately found to be innocent of the accusation, I still am. Please reconsider.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't deny that. The aforementioned account and this one are the only ones I possess. My point was this one is the only one I've edited from in over a year (because it's my permanent account now and I don't use the other), so I couldn't have possibly committed sockpuppetry. Look at my contributions, there's no evidence to support it. I was accused of this once before and was ultimately found to be innocent of the accusation, I still am. Please reconsider. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't deny that. The aforementioned account and this one are the only ones I possess. My point was this one is the only one I've edited from in over a year (because it's my permanent account now and I don't use the other), so I couldn't have possibly committed sockpuppetry. Look at my contributions, there's no evidence to support it. I was accused of this once before and was ultimately found to be innocent of the accusation, I still am. Please reconsider. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't deny that. The aforementioned account and this one are the only ones I possess. My point was this one is the only one I've edited from in over a year (because it's my permanent account now and I don't use the other), so I couldn't have possibly committed sockpuppetry. Look at my contributions, there's no evidence to support it. I was accused of this once before and was ultimately found to be innocent of the accusation, I still am. Please reconsider. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}