User talk:Sarah

Just FYI

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_on_Marihuana_and_Drug_Abuse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaGuardia_Commission http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Dain_Commission_of_Inquiry_into_the_Non-Medical_Use_of_Drugs

You will have to go back and edit all of those pages. You see, they all link to my site. You will have to have those articles up there with some mention like "The full text is on the web somewhere but our silly rules prevent us from telling you where it is."

Now the irony to this whole thing is that I PUT THOSE THINGS ON THE WEB. You wouldn't have two words to say about them if I hadn't. (There are more like them, BTW. That's because I put this research up while Wikipedia was still someone's wet dream.)

Are you beginning to feel like your "rules" may be just a little silly? If you like, I think I could make a good public argument why not linking to the full text of the thing the article is about is a bit silly.

RfA

You're going to accept I presume? Blnguyen | rant-line 06:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came to your talk page to ask of you if you'd ever considered becoming an administrator here at Wikipedia? I then discovered this heading addressing my exact question, and wondered if something was already afoot? I'd be happy to nominate you if it hasn't already occured. -- Longhair 05:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'd make a fine administrator, and will let what's already evolved run its' course. I do hope you decide to accept. Be sure to let me know once your request is online so I can lend my support. -- Longhair 05:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove the gallery?

Hi Sarah! I was wondering why you removed the photo gallery from the article on the Sydney Opera House. I believe it really gives the article something extra, and it would be quite preposterous to have all the images on there own, and the are really descriptive, beautiful images of the Opera House. I can really not see where you’re disagreement of the gallery is coming from. Please answer this on my user talk page. Jfp-24 11:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar vandalism

Thanks for sorting this out re User:Jeyler. He left a message for you here accusing you of vandalism, which I have reverted as vandalism. I presume you have no interest in such nonsense, but replace it if you want it recorded. Tyrenius 17:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Since we're in an "alliance", I thought I would say "Hello". =) -- Gogo Dodo 00:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Over there

One thing to move the "aboriginal name" (which begs more questions than answers) from the much vandalised mania to the south, it seemed at least a talk page item, no? SatuSuro 02:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Yes a quandary. I'll let it rest. If you are interested in tas things, maybe Cape Barren Island is worth putting on your watchlist, you'll understand when you check it SatuSuro 02:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that the uninvited unsigned talk on front of article page needed monitoring just in case he came back again :), and also the article in general needs a cleanup, I just didnt want to be the only editor watching if he did come back, so i have alerted a few others including admins :) SatuSuro 03:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At least we're not dealing with the 'Bass Strait Triangle' in this art :) sigh SatuSuro 04:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Mmm. Tried to set Werdnabot to 7 days, but it hasn't taken much notice. Do you know what's up? Ta. Will sort out other things asap. Tyrenius 19:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste move vandal

I see that you asked "Ed" to stop on the latest vandal to the redirects. Who does this refer to? (Feel free to answer me on my talk page). Ryūlóng 07:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BKPO

We have submitted a article about a company named BKPO. Please review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.163.143 (talk • contribs)

What happened on the Moon

Thanks for stepping in and helping out with this! Brianyoumans 08:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and again, thanks. I'm afraid I have an unfortunate urge to try to talk sense into people like this, but most of the time reason just makes them worse. I'll stop responding to him now. --Brianyoumans 09:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jackp

lol - you were quick tonight with your reverts. He always give himself away with the line "Sydney is famous for its culture Merbabu 13:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because its true, bloody jerk! Its ok to have room for beaches and landmarks. But when it comes to culture, Sydney is not existant. HAAAA! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.6.138.34 (talk • contribs)

Anthony Head

You're smart (or a Buffy fan...). It's blocked indefinitely now. Ta! Tyrenius 06:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Global cities

Oh, I see it’s ok to provide information on film festivals, fashion events or major finance companies in cities such as Toronto, Tokyo or NYC, but it isn’t ok to have room for Sydney and its Opera company, total bias! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.6.138.34 (talk • contribs)