Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel M. Shirley
A walled garden of vanity articles about a film maker, his company and his current production. Edited out of the latter is the fact that the movie is not due out until 2007. Vanity, not (yet) notable, crystal ballery. -- RHaworth 21:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete All per reasons given by nom. Came across this when reviewing the article on Bertie Stephens, which I have already nominated for deletion. Agent 86 22:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep All. They are a credible source, and considering this is an 'encyclopedia', what harm is there in allowing articles that have truth and substance. Why do people search an encyclopedia? to find information about something. What do these articles provide...truthful information. Ive seen more crap in more 'notable' articles.
- Keep All as per reasons above. yesselman 14:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep All RHaworth noted the fact the movie's not yet released, however future movie releases are allowed and i believe a stub has been added now
- Keep All Feel its unfair to say its a walled garden, when it's linked from and to 'roanoke' based articles
- Keep All ghits seem credible linked to film which external links seem credible