Talk:Cerebrum
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:New College of Florida/Become a Wikipedian (January 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Lehession (talk) 02:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Definition
I'm missing a short definition of cerebrum in the first sentence and/or disambiguation hatnotes. Is cerebrum a part of the brain, a synonym for brain or just the latin word for human brain? Isheden (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done (not by me though). Lova Falk talk 16:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Citations
I will be adding citations for the Structure and Function sections of this page. Changes should be minimal, unless I find inaccuracies in the information. Lehession (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Cool. Looie496 (talk) 19:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Great! --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
"Superior-most region"
The beginning of the article says that "the cerebrum is the superior-most region of the central nervous system". While, as a layman in this area, I do have an idea of what "superior-most" mean (my guess is "uppermost" in a standing human), I am not sure, and even when I followed the link to superior-most and tried to read what it said there, I still found no answer; I was actually just more puzzled (or confirmed in my uncertainty), as it says this:
"In Man, the directional terms "superior" and "inferior" essentially refer to this rostrocaudal dimension, because our body axis is roughly oriented vertically in the erect position. However, all vertebrates develop a kink in the neural tube that is still detectable in the adult central nervous system, known as the cephalic flexure. The latter bends the rostral part of the CNS at a 90 degree angle relative to the caudal part, at the transition between the forebrain and the brainstem and spinal cord. This change in axial dimension is problematic when trying to describe relative position and sectioning planes in the brain."
What I am left with is only an "essential" (non-complete) definition and a statement that it is "problematic", and I am still not sure if "superior-most" means "uppermost" or "frontmost" when talking about the brain or the nervous system.
This might mostly be a problem with the section "Orientation in neuroanatomy" in the neuroanatomy article (it is not very easy to read if you just want a quick answer for a human orientational term, as the article tries to be general for all animals), but it could also help if it was made clearer in this article, for instance by stating " (uppermost)" or " (frontmost)" after "superior-most".
I was also thinking about changing the "superior-most" link to refer to Anatomical terms of location#Superior_and_inferior instead, as it gives a more direct description of superior and inferior which leaves me 99% sure it means "uppermost" (or "uppermost in a standing human") in this case.
Can anyone medically educated (or anyone through a credible reference) clear the last 1% of doubt in me? Does superior-most mean uppermost in this case? --Jhertel (talk) 19:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Jhertel it can only mean uppermost in the context - unless somebody knows better! Have changed it. cheers --Iztwoz (talk) 21:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Iztwoz! --Jhertel (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cerebrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130709024438/https://www.neuinfo.org/mynif/search.php?q=Cerebrum&t=data&s=cover&b=0&r=20 to https://www.neuinfo.org/mynif/search.php?q=Cerebrum&t=data&s=cover&b=0&r=20
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)