User talk:Cochese8

It appears that some WP users feel they are larger than the idea. Sorry I gave you the wrong impression. Cheers J

Re Logo

Hi Cochese8. You are totally right BUT they are all under an explict section called Examples. -- Szvest 15:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC) User:FayssalF/Sign[reply]

Yes, and the adbusters and Red Cross/Red Crescent logos?Cochese8 18:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Logo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Wmahan . 15:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Nigel ^(Talk) 15:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 8 hours. Here are the reverts in question. alphaChimp^(talk) 16:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cochese8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alphachimp- I appreciate your upholding WP rules, but have you read the Talk:Logo, Talk:Logo#Disputed_link more precisely? Justice is not being served, however small a scale this is

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Alphachimp- I appreciate your upholding WP rules, but have you read the [[Talk:Logo]], [[Talk:Logo#Disputed_link]] more precisely? Justice is not being served, however small a scale this is |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Alphachimp- I appreciate your upholding WP rules, but have you read the [[Talk:Logo]], [[Talk:Logo#Disputed_link]] more precisely? Justice is not being served, however small a scale this is |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Alphachimp- I appreciate your upholding WP rules, but have you read the [[Talk:Logo]], [[Talk:Logo#Disputed_link]] more precisely? Justice is not being served, however small a scale this is |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I read the most recent straw poll at Talk:Logo#STRAW_POLL_on_disputed_link. It seems pretty clear that the consensus is to remove the link. alphaChimp^(talk) 17:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]