User talk:Bloodofox

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2; 3; 4;

Hello! Please note that if you leave a post at the bottom of the page, I will also respond to it on this page. Thank you for taking the time to get in contact with me.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Unfortunately, I failed to add the Vegvisir page to my "watching" list.

I am astounded that all the correct information I added and all the poor and incorrect information I removed has been completely trashed. "Flowers" is not a good reference, his translation is incorrect. The Huld manuscript is not the only manuscript it exists in, and certainly is not from 1880. I see no reason why the Björk and Skyrim references were removed, nor references to my source research pages.

I will reverted this page to my last version. If you object to this, please let's discuss it.

Justin F (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've again reverted your adjustments ([1]). You're responsible for sourcing material you add. Adding a random "Foster (2015)" with no referent helps no one. :bloodofox: (talk) 04:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But the references do link to the source pages - for the translation quote and all the other information, they are both on my web page and the academic paper I've written The paper gives the full translation of Huld manuscript. Why did you just go reversing it? I will put it back. If anything, I can somehow expand the reference to give the titles of the web page and the paper? Would that satisfy you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galdrastafir.sigil (talk • contribs) 04:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I can add my full name - would that satisfy the requirements? ~ Justin Foster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galdrastafir.sigil (talk • contribs) 05:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I presume you're referring to this article: [2]. Did this appear in a publication? :bloodofox: (talk) 05:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I have made the paper available free to download online. Does not make this a publication? Prior to this it was reviewed and edited by qualified people, including staff of the Árni Magnússom Institute. No, it has not appeared in any other publication. It has been referred to and appeared in the bibliographies of two books available for sale. It has been read by over 12,000 people.

I am regarded as the leading world expert on this subject, certainly in the English-speaking world. I still don't understand your problem with me, and I find that very frustrating.

Archives (Index)
1 2 3 4