User talk:Keybeeny
June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Weather Channel. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 22:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
I would add that, unless sensitive personal information is at stake, discussions about a Wikipedia article should be conducted on Wikipedia, for openness and transparency among editors. If you have any questions, please post them here. Thanks 331dot (talk) 22:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
What part of "Kelly Cass and Alexandra Wilson are the hosts of AMHQ Weekend and Weather Underground, respectively" is so hard to accept??? HERE ARE THE SOURCES: www.facebook.com/twckellycass , www.facebook.com/twcalexwilson , as well as www.weather.com , which is one of the most highly trafficked websites on the Internet! I created an account. I provided sources and references. The explanations given for deleting my corrections include "Makes no Sense"...??? Would you please fix this and inform DMacks and bbb23 that they have not acted in accordance with the Wikipedia term of use? Keybeeny (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Facebook pages (or anything user-editable) are not generally considered reliable sources. Wikipedia is not interested in what article subjects say about themselves, Wikipedia is interested in what other sources say about them. Weather.com isn't valid as a sole reliable source as they have an interest in writing positively about their employees. I again urge you to review the notability guidelines which will give you an idea of what is being looked for. Please stop with the Terms of Use violation claim; there isn't one here. 331dot (talk) 23:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- I also highly suggest that you remove your statement that you just posted to the article talk page as it is not constructive to resolving this situation, and will only make it worse for you as you now appear to only be interested in promoting the two people. Please remain calm and discuss this matter. 331dot (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Facebook and Twitter have come up with a Blue Checkmark to denote "certified" pages. Most people do not have the Blue Checkmark and thus are less trustworthy and believable. However, the accounts of Weather Channel meteorologists ave them.
Please click on this link from weather.com. This is not "writing positively about their employees", it is a factual summary of what Kelly Cass does on that TV Network.
https://weather.com/tv/personalities/news/kelly-cass
Please also click on this link from weather.com. It is also another summary of what Alexandra Wilson does on that network.
https://weather.com/tv/personalities/news/alex-wilson
If you are saying that these references, as well as Facebook and Twitter pages with the Blue Checkmark are not sufficient references, then it is you who are being unreasonable, not me. Keybeeny (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Here is video proving that Kelly and Alex are AMHQ and WU hosts on TWC . I guess next you are going to tell me that Youtube isn't a reliable source either?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEeCFMO-0k0