User talk:Cochese8

Linkocrites

I was blocked 3rr because I was maintaining justice, which is in a sad state on this website. The world was such a better place when I was blocked. Now the link isn't there and the page is locked- there were celebrations all over the world, I'm sure.

There are little bands of link police who target certain people and ignore violators of their own rules if those violators side with them. here is a list of the hypocrites concerned with the recent Logo page:

User:Wmahan, Nigel, Pascal.Tesson, Mr. Darcy

All I ask is that people be consistent instead of targeting others.

Summary on the Logo debate

Reason that the straw poll on Talk:Logo ended up like it did was because the little band of hypocrites kiss and hug wach other on the sidelines in exchange for votes like these. Of course no one is going to defend some link that they have no affiliation with, but the only reason that so many are against it is because they have personal ties to the people who was it removed or they are in competition with the link. The proof of their hypocracy is that they agree that the standards for links should be the same, but they don't concentrate on links that violate the same things (all the other links on Logo are/have advertisements, lack citations).

It's pathetic, but I will continue to try to make them realize what they really are and hopefully change their hypocracy. It may be a hopeless effort, but no one ever gained anything without trying.

From Logo:Talk

Thanks for trying to save people's time, User:Wmahan. However, I don't think enough time can be spent on justice. Every editor may have valid reasons for wanting the link removed, but won't use that same reasoning to delete other links as quickly as they deleted the disputed one. This whole thing started as a part of your crusade against jsmorse47 and treats one link differently than the others. Proof that you have something against jsmorse47 is that you won't work to remove spam created by User:Jkatzen as seen User_talk:Wmahan#Fodder_for_your_anti-spam_campaign and User_talk:Wmahan#Comments_by_JSMorse. The posts by Jkatzen, including some of his Logo page additions [(a link to a page he created to support one of his websites)] are in violation of the same things that Wmahan criticized User:Jsmorse47 for doing Talk:Basal_metabolic_rate#External_link, yet, when presented with this, he merely shrugged it off as retaliation. This is the kind of inconsistent behavior on WP that makes for injustice. I will continue to work against that type of thing. Thanks for reading Cochese8 15:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk page comments

to: I@n

Not embarrassed. I want people to see certain things when they come to my talk page, not inane comments by people I don't know. Cochese8 01:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)