Jump to content

User talk:Altenmann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 92.228.153.156 (talk) at 03:09, 17 December 2017 (→Metro Russia: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

{{Eastern Slavic name}} {{Not a typo}} {{typo}} 

/////////
wazzup

-

List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change

30 October 2024

neuedit

-   neublatter

30 October 2024

-


Template:Sovietpd-text listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Sovietpd-text. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Sovietpd-text redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pppery 20:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agrotown (Belarus)

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Agrotown (Belarus) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is mostly not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Chefallen (talk) 19:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reverted in Chernozem

Hello. I saw you reverted my edits that added the Symbolism section to the Chernozem article, and now i agree that the source may have been a bad one. However i added that content based on the Ukrainian Insurgent Army article, which already lists Chernozem as being represented in their flag. I wonder, could we find better sources to cite in the article, and make it trustworthy to re-add that information on it? YuriNikolai (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Portfolio Selection models listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alternative Portfolio Selection models. Since you had some involvement with the Alternative Portfolio Selection models redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not every dimension is machined

Regarding your reversion on Inspection; while most dimensions may be machined, not every inspected dimension is machined (that is, machine cut or ground), some are cast, pressed, stamped, extruded, etched, welded, filled, sprayed, etc, and now, printed. Thinking of it now, as one who has been a job shop machined part inspector, but now inspecting software, the term machined now seems a bit jargony, even if one is only thinking of manufacturing. IveGoneAway (talk) 16:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wyr

Template:Wyr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read about LEAD

Please read WP:LEAD and WP:CITELEAD.

New material does not go in the top of the article in the intro section, as you did here [1].

Additionally, using wording such as One must be cautious about, appears to violate NPOV. Sagecandor (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For a new account aren't we a wee too knowledgeable? Please disclose which other accounts you own. - üser:Altenmann >t

Yo Ho Ho

Iryna Harpy (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.

Nomination of Clintonism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clintonism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clintonism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tanktop.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tanktop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
With greetings from Head of Diplomatic Corp of People's Republic of San Escobar for profound activity for Polish-Sanescobarean mutual recognizition and cooperation. Velemr (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of San Escobar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Escobar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Escobar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PuchaczTrado (talk) 06:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anatoly Zolotukhin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anatoly Zolotukhin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatoly Zolotukhin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 21:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inshallah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inshallah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inshallah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  16:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Grin's Father's Surname

Please explain why you reverted my edit? - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Grin&oldid=prev&diff=769643415 This fact (that the real family name of Stefan Grinevsky was Grynyavitsky or Hrynayvitsky) is proved by official sources:

Da voli (talk) 20:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Da voli: because (A) szlachtic polski cannot possibly have official name spelled in belarusian at that time and (B) it contradicts other sources and excuse me the author of texts you cite are not reliable and they dont cite the source of their information. so i prefer to believe info from grin's museum. - üser:Altenmann >t 17:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kukuruku

A tag has been placed on Kukuruku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Uncle Roy (talk) 00:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Besprizornik

Besprizornik isn't an orphan, but rather a street child.Xx236 (talk) 07:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question about block of User:Mikgalai

You blocked User:Mikgalai, and deleted the user page User:Mikgalai, in both cases with the logged reason "Impersonation of me". Now that user has requested an unblock, denying any such impersonation. I don't see any such impersonation in any of the contributions of User:Mikgalai, including the deleted contributions. Please explain how and where that user impersonated you, with diffs. I am finding it very hard to understand this block. DES (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC) See the block log for reference. DES (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @DESiegel: my name was mikkalai. At that time i had a struggle with a romanian nationalst vandal who created a bunch of sleeper accounts with names similar to mine and did some stupidities from some of them. Dont you smell something fishy with an unblock request 11 years later from a person without edits who knows what interests i have and in which hemisphere i am. If not, i dont care anymore. P.S. your request about diffs is funny. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original source for Western Army (Russia)

Hello Altenmann, do you remember where you got the information in these paragraphs of the Western Army (Russia) article? I have recently been working on expanding the article and would like to know where I can find sources to reference the information. Kges1901 (talk) 13:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC) @Kges1901: sorry for being sloppy with refs these early wikiyears. It was some russia nn text try to google the two russiann terms mentioned. Unfortunatrly i have limited abilities now to help you more. - üser:Altenmann >t 03:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

whataboutism

It is a Soviet government term. Half the article shouldn't be about Trump. The part I took out didn't add anything more than what I left. It's pointless. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 02:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corinne Lamberth Paper

Hello, I saw you contributed to the Aquaphilia(fetish) article back in 2007 and am wondering if you have access to the paper by Corinne Lamberth from 1998 on the psychology of the subject. I would also be very interested in getting an insight into the "Aquaphiles Journal" by Phil Bolton – maybe there is a Link I can feed the Wayback Machine? I am planning to write my bachelor thesis on this little written about topic so any sources are helpful. Best, --Jafschmidt (talk) 18:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English words of Ukrainian origin

Hi Altenmann. You created List of Ukrainian terms, which was merged to List of English words of Ukrainian origin, which was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English words of Ukrainian origin. Cunard (talk) 05:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Law of the Russian Empire has been nominated for discussion

Category:Law of the Russian Empire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revolutionary propaganda

The article Revolutionary propaganda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Bolshevik propaganda

You may find this article amusing, btw. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big iron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big iron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big iron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 17:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Altenmann. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scientific communism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scientific communism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific communism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 02:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Russia

WP:RUSSIA consistently uses the type name in upper case:

It's also found in sources, despite some claiming otherwise.

Still some want to change it: Talk:Kalininsko-Solntsevskaya Line#Requested move 11 December 2017, and after it is moved they will not change the articles and for years to come there will be inconsistency between texts and titles. 92.228.153.156 (talk) 03:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Altenmann&oldid=815782411"