Jump to content

User talk:Psl85

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Psl85 (talk | contribs) at 18:12, 11 February 2018 (Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Psl85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~), or by clicking the button, this will automatically insert your signature with username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 13:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GameCube. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This is extremely disruptive to do a cut and paste move of this nature, especially in light of a recent Requested Move for this that failed and had a clear consensus against it. -- ferret (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do this again and I'll block on the spot. This isn't your first attempt at this, and your previous effort to get the redirect deleted was also reverted. -- ferret (talk) 12:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for notifying me. I would rather have the official name as the title rather than simply "GameCube". I'll try to NOT do it again. Psl85 talk edits 12:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

hi, its Daffaakbarr. I indeed did a significant change on Pitch Perfect 2. I removed the majority of the music section and moved them to their own page, which i just created, so it will be like the first film's music section. I also changed the image to match the Pitch Perfect and Pitch Perfect 3 posters displayed, since the one i newly uploaded matches them. I genuinely forgot to write an edit summary i'm so sorry. because honestly even i'm not a relatively new user, i'm still very stiff in this wikipedia world. I just simply want the page to be in the same formation as the first Pitch Perfect and maybe eventually i'll do the same with the third film's page. Daffaakbarr (talk) 18:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Psl85 talk edits 18:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]
Can I revert my edits on the article? Psl85 talk edits 18:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]


watt

Literally nothing about it is unconstructive. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you gonna try and answer or just keep putting a bunch of fake warnings up? 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!, the warnings is for you vandalize articles, not fake warnings. Psl85 talk edits 17:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1) I am literally allowed to do whatever I want on my own talk page. 2) You are crying "vandalism" at literally the most ordinary of edits without explanation and throwing a fit. YOU need to explain. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked at the edits the IP made, and I'm not seeing how they can be considered vandalism. If the edits don't look like they've been done with malicious intent (which is not the case here), don't revert them as vandalism, because they're not. And if you really do need to revert the good faith edits, then actually explain the reasons for it.
Oh, and users are allowed to remove content from their own user talk pages per WP:OWNTALK; that is, if a user is not currently blocked and they removed any messages on their talk page, don't readd them. Thank you. SkyWarrior 18:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SkyWarrior:, it's looks like they're going through a slew of recent edits to put up "unconstructive edit" warnings on people's pages, some of which may be equally unwarranted. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1) I am literally allowed to do whatever I want on my own talk page. 2) You are crying "vandalism" at literally the most ordinary of edits without explanation and throwing a fit. YOU need to explain. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked at the edits the IP made, and I'm not seeing how they can be considered vandalism. If the edits don't look like they've been done with malicious intent (which is not the case here), don't revert them as vandalism, because they're not. And if you really do need to revert the good faith edits, then actually explain the reasons for it.
Oh, and users are allowed to remove content from their own user talk pages per WP:OWNTALK; that is, if a user is not currently blocked and they removed any messages on their talk page, don't readd them. Thank you. SkyWarrior 18:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at James G. Watt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Psl85 talk edits 18:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will not do it more, this user rapidy revert my edits. Psl85 talk edits 18:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psl85&oldid=825134836"