Jump to content

User talk:Shoteh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SporkBot (talk | contribs) at 23:52, 3 November 2018 (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thanking for Welcome

Thank You very much for your nice Welcome massage.HagiMalachi (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Thank You very much for your nice Welcome massage.Shoteh (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad you're here! Also, when you get the chance, check out WikiProject Plants and consider joining us. Rkitko (talk) 17:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etrog Talk Page

Etrog is not a certain cultivar within citrus medica, but is how the Jews are calling it, according to the special use during Tabernacles. The Greek Citron is actually called variety etrog, but in fact many other varieties ( for e.g. the Diamante) are even preferred by many.Shoteh (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a bit of investigating a while ago, but I never got a clear picture of whether it was a cultivar or simply a variety. Either way, the taxobox should be updated to reflect that. Is it Citrus medica var. etrog? Or is it Citrus medica 'Etrog'? Sources were conflicting, though. Something must be done to the taxobox, though, to make it plain and simple to see that it is not Citrus medica. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 17:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. So from your info above, Etrog is neither a named cultivar or a published taxon? So then the taxobox should be removed entirely if it's not a taxon. Rkitko (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rkitko, You are probably right about the matter but I don't find the box which fitt the purpose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoteh (talkcontribs) 18:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's ok. It's not such a big deal. I'm sure it will get fixed some day. You seem to have a good knowledge of the citrons, so I'll leave it in your capable hands! Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 19:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I placed an image at Diamante citron and the very important caption doesn't show up. I would appriciate if you can fix it. Shoteh (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. It was just missing the "thumb" parameter from the image link. --Rkitko (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much Shoteh (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. And just to let you know, most people prefer new messages on their talk page to go at the bottom, at least that's the trend I've seen. And you don't need to create a new thread every time. I simply moved all your messages to one of the threads you started at User talk:Rkitko#Etrog Talk Page. A minor point, but thought I'd mention it. :-) Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 20:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please {{helpme}} get a translation of the latin text from Giovanni Baptista Ferrari regarding the Diamante citron, as well as the same about the Greek Citron in the following page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoteh (talkcontribs)

Hmm, does an official translation of the text exist? Wikipedia prefers official translations. Doing it yourself can be a violation of some policies and guidelines (like no original research - it also isn't very verifiable since your translation may differ from someone else's). Are you asking for help finding such a translation? Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange might be the place to ask for help regarding such a resource. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High Capacity Files

Hi there! You mentioned on my talk page that you have some computer files which are copies of an "old book not available for sale." It is acceptable to cite books in wikipedia articles. Sources need not be just websites. As long as the book is a reliable source then feel free to go and cite it. The templateCite book is a great way to do this (instructions are on the page). If you need any more help please feel free to post here or on my talk page. Best regards! --omtay38 01:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello, maybe you are the user with the nickname fr:Utilisateur:Yeshiva witch is creating articles about etrog in the french wikipedia. Anyway i requested the speed delation of those articles cause they were translated automatically. I will try to translate them correctly latter cause they are realy interesting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimdime69 (talkcontribs) 22:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not. Thank You for the offer to transelate my articles, your massage sounds like transelated from French.

Shoteh (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well they are translated in my brain from french to english but hopefully I don't need an authomatic translator to do such a thing;) Anyway I do apologize for the mistake and will try to translate those articles asap. Best regards--Kimdime69 (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove those interwiki links, as authomatic translation is not acceptable those articles will be delated in thew minutes, I will add new links when the articles will be recreated and translated correctly. Regards--Kimdime69 (talk) 22:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candied fruit

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Candied fruit. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Freepsbane (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

My apologies for the misunderstanding I did not see the discussion sorry for your trouble. if you have any more comments you can post them on my talk page Freepsbane (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting pages from Wikipedia:Requested moves

Don't do this again. Llamasharmafarmerdrama (talk) 23:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would help if I could, but I'm not an admin so I can't do anything about it. I guess you could try using {{helpme}} but unless an admin notices it, you won't get what is needed. I think the best solution is to wait longer or ask an admin directly.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 04:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, not that I know of. You can try my friend User:Seresin and say that I suggested asking you. He's really nice, I'm sure he'll help if he's not busy.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 23:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I guess it does work sometimes. Well I'm glad it you found what you needed, sorry I couldn't help you on it.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 19:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD proposal

AfD nomination of Chaim Elozor Wax

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chaim Elozor Wax, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaim Elozor Wax. Thank you. Smerus (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the category Botany for this article, with the argument that it is too broad, and citrus is enough. This is not true since bizzaria is a historical case in understanding of botany and hybridization, as you can see Charles Darwin and all the genetists were busy with the Bizzaria. In fact, the category Botany is even more important than the category Citrus, and please recorrect yourself. Shoteh (talk) 20:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by my reason. Look at the other articles in Category:Botany. Categorization is supposed to be used as a hierarchy. I don't believe that Bizzaria is a general topic of botany. Categorization is supposed to be as specific as allowed. Bizzaria should not remain in that category. WP:CAT will have the appropriate guidelines for categorization. --Rkitko (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Halichos Sadeh.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Halichos Sadeh.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 18:13, May 6, 2008 (UTC) 18:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PDF IfD

Firstly, I wasn't aware of the link due to it being in external link format, like this, and not in wikilink format, like this. I fail to see the relevance that the document has to the article [although I cannot read Hebrew, PDF documents are not usually useful]. After all, this is the English Wikipedia; the Hebrew Wikipedia may have more use for it. Regardless, please feel free to make your opinion known on the IfD page. Thanks. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 17:04, May 8, 2008 (UTC)

This article is by a high esteemed professor and horticulturist, which is written in Hebrew because the most interested in citron studies are the Hebrew speaking Jews. But when one wants to know anything about the citron which was the ancestor of all the cultivated types he would have no access to it. The English Wikipedia is the first to provide such infomation of which part of it is gathered from Hebrew sources, and was later cited by many other authors and websites. By deleting such a pdf, which is a very important and interesting article, you are decreasing the usefullness of the English Wikipedia, and banging the door for the citrus industry in Wikipedia. Dont do such an evil.

Shoteh (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greek citron

Good morning. How wide is your browser window? If it's wide enough for the table of contents to fit between the two images, then Greek citron looks OK, although unusual. Make it narrower, and the table of contents either overlaps the first image, or is partly hidden behind the second. I tried it in two different browsers. - Fayenatic (talk) 08:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I confirm that the picture arrangement is fine now.

You twice removed the copy edit tag without improving the article. Please do not do this; it is a marker to other users of Wikipedia to acknowledge that an article is still a work in progress.

In the case of this article, just looking at the first sentence:

  • the first appearance of the article title should be in bold text according to the Manual of Style;
  • "it's" in line 2 should not have had an apostrophe;
  • there is no such word as "rituali"; and
  • "extraordinary" is one word, not two.

I've copy edited the whole of the first paragraph; please let me know whether my changes are acceptable to you. I am willing to go through the rest of the article when I have time; it's what I do best! - Fayenatic (talk) 21:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


{{help-me}} how to flush one of the media in the article to the left, to enhance the graphic layout. Shoteh (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the [[image]] tag, change the |right to |left. Hope this helps!Gazimoff WriteRead 21:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Review

Hello there and thanks for your recent responses to the questions at User:Shoteh/RfA review. At the moment we're just looking at the process itself and what editors' opinions of the various stages are. We're not looking for recommendations on candidates - it's purely a process review. Please could you have a look over your responses and and update them with your thoughts and opinions on the process only. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask, either here or on my talk page. Many thanks for your time and your valuable input. Gazimoff WriteRead 20:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Issue with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD

Thank you for expressing your concerns on the recent issue Issue with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD . I have made some comments and explainations at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#TinucherianBot and I am leaving this note just for your information -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Old Yishuv

Hi Shoteh,
could you come and give your mind here : [1].
Thank you :-) Ceedjee (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etrog

Please refer to Talk:Etrog#Unexplained deletion. DrorK (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Jewish genetics

A tag has been placed on Jewish genetics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nudve (talk) 11:24, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no good reason

There is a very good reason to remove external links from a wikipedia article - wikipedia is not a collection of links. There are probably a thousand pictures of etrogs on the internet - do you plan to provide links to them all? There are also hundreds of sites that sell etrogs - why do you only link to milechai? Please read the wikipedia page on external links. You will see that all of the links I removed fail the test for inclusion, and they all fit the criteria for links to avoid. --Bachrach44 (talk) 12:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Etrog photo used without attribution

Dear Wikipedia There is a photo that appears on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balady_citron

The photo is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Halpern.jpg

I came across this today and to my amazement it is one of my photos being used without attribution. It appears on my web site www.esrogfarm.com

at: www.esrogfarm.com/nggallery/page-19/album-1/gallery-3/

You can see another photo of a similar item taken with the same background. You can use this photo only on condition that you properly attribute it to Zaide Reuven's Esrog Farm, with a clickable link to www.esrogfarm.com. Otherwise you may not use this photo.


David Wiseman Zaide Reuven's Esrog Farm, LLC. www.esrogfarm.com esrog@esrogfarm.com 972 931 5596 972 931 5476 FAX —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.242.70.151 (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on JafGifts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on JafGifts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jaf Gifts.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Jaf Gifts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jaf Gifts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)|}[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]