Jump to content

User talk:DARIO SEVERI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DARIO SEVERI (talk | contribs) at 11:44, 7 January 2019 (Wonderful). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User talk:DARIO SEVERI/Archive1

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DARIO SEVERI. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DARIO SEVERI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atenção usuários da Wikipédia

Quero uma arbitragem nesta questão. Usuário Chronus afirma que eu o insultei. Onde e quando ocorreu isso? Apenas disse que ele está promovendo uma perseguição às minhas edições e isto É VERDADE, E QUE ISTO PARECE PESSOAL, o que eu também acredito./ O usuário apagou todas minhas mensagens dirigidas a ele. Insiste em apagar minhas edições, e afirma que estou promovendo uma guerra de edições contra ele. Solicito a arbitragem de um editor sênior para confirmar suas alegações.

Usuário:SanSilva 21h20min de 7 de fevereiro de 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanSilva (talkcontribs)

Este assunto foi resolvido por outros sysops, não é necessária a minha atuação nisto. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DARIO SEVERI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DARIO SEVERI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful

Hi. Many thanks for your help. Remove Undo/cancel/restore some more of my edits from here (need to restore pages back). Great job, congratulations. That's all. --Үрүйэ (talk) 04:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. Remove this templates: 1, 2, 3, 4, restore 5, 6 - remove all my edits from the template space. Categories from articles also need to be removed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... ... You did not delete everything. Need to remove everything. They're all vandalous, have a bad translation\alphabet. Find and delete all my edits, please. --Үрүйэ (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So many vandal categories left, delete all my edits, templates too/ --Үрүйэ (talk) 09:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to delete but I do not have so much time ... I am still working in a company I'll see if I can find someone to help me with this. Regards. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 10:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ok, try faster, please. I think, pages must be removed without the right to restore. So that other illiterate participants do not repeat my mistakes. I do not understand what help you need. U are good, remove further. --Үрүйэ (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Colleague, I do not understand the language and I have already asked someone to analyze if my first action was correct, I am in a position that I can not make mistakes so we will wait for the confirmation of a steward unless you help me to eliminate the wrong edits. I take the opportunity to wish you a Happy New Year. Regards DARIO SEVERI (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
All participants want my contribution to be deleted, they told you that it was vandalism. You don't need to think, you must believe their community - they are native speakers. Remove all my contributions, really they are all wrong . If you want i can help. I will not complain, then you can ban me globally. --Үрүйэ (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Үрүйэ, I am not block you globally because I had a problem in one Wiikipedia only. I'm going to remove your block so you can help in removing something that you did wrong. I do not have too much free time so I will appreciate your collaboration. Regards. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 09:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted you to zero my contribution first. That is all wrong. But if you do not have time I will help. How to start, cancel and put a template to be deleted? I'll do some first, see how it works. Maybe I will create a second template (for deletion) so that the pages fall into a temporary category:deletion2, at the end you will remove them. I think it will be convenient for you. --Үрүйэ (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Үрүйэ ... Wonderful ideia create a second template (for deletion) so that the pages fall into a temporary category:deletion2. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary category for deletion here. I returned them their correct version, my bad categories are set to remove. That's all for today. Good luck. (ps\In the history of the page it is impossible to cancel several revisions. So I had to edit before their version). --Үрүйэ (talk) 10:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Great help Үрүйэ, congratulation!. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Үрүйэ, there are categories that you created like this "Категория:Арип боюнча акча бирдиктери" (see [1]) that had been added previously in category by other editors like this [2], your edition is correct so I can not anymore eliminate it as if it were something wrong. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 12:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. When you delete my editions they will have a red category. I think there is no problem. Creating categories is very easy, they themselves will do it quickly and correctly. Besides, you must remember that they don't like my edits. Today there will be few pages. Thank. --Үрүйэ (talk) 04:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Үрүйэ ... Glogal sysop can not eliminate what is not a vandalism or spam. I can not delete only because they do not like your edits. You're not a vandal, you was acting in good faith despite using a different alphabet. So I asked editors who know the language well to look at the categories you created and decide if they really should be deleted. Thanks for the help you gave me. Obviously I will not block you but it is better that you avoid creating something on that Wikipedia unless you use the correct alphabet. Best regards. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You believed this member from the beginning. I know why he hates me. He wanted to be an administrator, but I voted against him. He did not like it and he deleted it (to the purpose, this removal is similar to vandalism). I think he is a weak participant, uncommunicative, inactive. I opened the discussions about the problems of their Wikipedia. Wishing to discuss was not. On the contrary, this wrong member decided to remove me, wrote complaints. He and u called my contribution as vandal, it was like an insult. But the most important, this wrong participant did not help you stop the removal but watched silently and was pleased.

DARIO SEVERI, I've always had and now have the correct alphabet. I'm sorry you didn't delete everything, such participants did not need to help. There are always participants in Wikipedia like dog in the manger. No desire to communicate with such participants. Love your wikipedia where you have any power. That's all, it was fun. --Үрүйэ (talk) 07:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Үрүйэ, I did not believe only in him I believed in you, you told me:
  • Need to remove everything. They're all vandalous, have a bad translation\alphabet. Find and delete all my edits, please (see [3])
  • So many vandal categories left, delete all my edits, templates too/ (see [4])
  • So that other illiterate participants do not repeat my mistakes. (see [5]
  • They are native speakers. Remove all my contributions, really they are all wrong. (see [6])
  • I wanted you to zero my contribution first. That is all wrong. (see [7])
  • I returned them their correct version, my bad categories are set to remove. (see [8])
If you had told me what you wrote above I probably would not have deleted them. I'll stop editing on this Wikipedia and let both of you decide what's right or wrong. Regards. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]