User talk:Otac0n

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Otac0n", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. ceranthor 13:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z15

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Otac0n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Otac0n is a name I have used all over the web for a long time. I have also had this account for a long time with no issues. Otac0n is not an organization to my knowledge, certainly not stylized the way I have it in this account and all of my other accounts. My personal blog is at http://otac0n.com/

Decline reason:

The username policy specifically states that websites are not permitted as usernames. You could make an argument that your username is grandfathered, but I think it would save you some grief to change your username, even it is just to add something to it. 331dot (talk) 00:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Otac0n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have cryptographic proof that this domain is a personal name and the domain refers to the same person as John Gietzen.

https://keybase.io/otac0n

This page provides verifiable cryptographic evidence that all of these entities refer to the same person:

The Keybase Identity "otac0n"
The Twitter handle "otac0n"
The Github user "otac0n"
The Reddit user "otac0n"
The domain name "otac0n.com", which is in dispute.

Here's the section of the rules you cite:

Your username must represent you as an individual person

Usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia if they:

only contain the names of companies, organizations, websites, musical groups or bands, teams, social media or streaming channels, or creative groups

are promotional in nature, or appear to advertise, promote, sell, or gain support or user base of any person, company, market, product, channel, or other good or service

imply that your user account will be shared between more than one person

only describe a role, title, or position within an organization that can be represented or held by different people

The fact of the matter is that the name "otac0n" only refers to me as a person. I have a PERSONAL blog at the domain of the same name as myself, which doesn't change the fact that the name "otac0n" refers to me. I'm not asking to be grandfathered in. Instead, I'm requesting a fair reading of the quoted rules section. My view is that a personal blog doesn't meet the bar of a "website" in the context above (since it is used in contrast to the concept of an individual person), and that personal domain names likewise don't invalidate that individual person's name can be used as a username.

In addition, reading carefully the blocking policy, this block doesn't seem to be in line with the "preventative" nature spelled out within. To my understanding, the only thing this block would be preventing is me representing myself as myself.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have cryptographic proof that this domain is a personal name and the domain refers to the same person as John Gietzen.

https://keybase.io/otac0n

This page provides verifiable cryptographic evidence that all of these entities refer to the same person:

:* The Keybase Identity "otac0n"
:* The Twitter handle "otac0n"
:* The Github user "otac0n"
:* The Reddit user "otac0n"
:* '''The domain name "otac0n.com", which is in dispute.'''


Here's the section of the rules you cite:

'''Your username must represent you as an ''individual person'''''

:Usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia if they:

:*only contain the names of companies, organizations, websites, musical groups or bands, teams, social media or streaming channels, or creative groups

:*are promotional in nature, or appear to advertise, promote, sell, or gain support or user base of any person, company, market, product, channel, or other good or service

:*imply that your user account will be shared between more than one person

:*only describe a role, title, or position within an organization that can be represented or held by different people


The fact of the matter is that the name "otac0n" only refers to me as a person.  I have a PERSONAL blog at the domain of the same name as myself, which doesn't change the fact that the name "otac0n" refers to me.  I'm not asking to be grandfathered in. Instead, I'm requesting a fair reading of the quoted rules section.  My view is that a personal blog doesn't meet the bar of a "website" in the context above (since it is used in contrast to the concept of an individual person), and that personal domain names likewise don't invalidate that individual person's name can be used as a username.

In addition, reading carefully the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking policy]], this block doesn't seem to be in line with the "preventative" nature spelled out within.  To my understanding, the only thing this block would be preventing is me representing myself as myself. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have cryptographic proof that this domain is a personal name and the domain refers to the same person as John Gietzen.

https://keybase.io/otac0n

This page provides verifiable cryptographic evidence that all of these entities refer to the same person:

:* The Keybase Identity "otac0n"
:* The Twitter handle "otac0n"
:* The Github user "otac0n"
:* The Reddit user "otac0n"
:* '''The domain name "otac0n.com", which is in dispute.'''


Here's the section of the rules you cite:

'''Your username must represent you as an ''individual person'''''

:Usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia if they:

:*only contain the names of companies, organizations, websites, musical groups or bands, teams, social media or streaming channels, or creative groups

:*are promotional in nature, or appear to advertise, promote, sell, or gain support or user base of any person, company, market, product, channel, or other good or service

:*imply that your user account will be shared between more than one person

:*only describe a role, title, or position within an organization that can be represented or held by different people


The fact of the matter is that the name "otac0n" only refers to me as a person.  I have a PERSONAL blog at the domain of the same name as myself, which doesn't change the fact that the name "otac0n" refers to me.  I'm not asking to be grandfathered in. Instead, I'm requesting a fair reading of the quoted rules section.  My view is that a personal blog doesn't meet the bar of a "website" in the context above (since it is used in contrast to the concept of an individual person), and that personal domain names likewise don't invalidate that individual person's name can be used as a username.

In addition, reading carefully the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking policy]], this block doesn't seem to be in line with the "preventative" nature spelled out within.  To my understanding, the only thing this block would be preventing is me representing myself as myself. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have cryptographic proof that this domain is a personal name and the domain refers to the same person as John Gietzen.

https://keybase.io/otac0n

This page provides verifiable cryptographic evidence that all of these entities refer to the same person:

:* The Keybase Identity "otac0n"
:* The Twitter handle "otac0n"
:* The Github user "otac0n"
:* The Reddit user "otac0n"
:* '''The domain name "otac0n.com", which is in dispute.'''


Here's the section of the rules you cite:

'''Your username must represent you as an ''individual person'''''

:Usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia if they:

:*only contain the names of companies, organizations, websites, musical groups or bands, teams, social media or streaming channels, or creative groups

:*are promotional in nature, or appear to advertise, promote, sell, or gain support or user base of any person, company, market, product, channel, or other good or service

:*imply that your user account will be shared between more than one person

:*only describe a role, title, or position within an organization that can be represented or held by different people


The fact of the matter is that the name "otac0n" only refers to me as a person.  I have a PERSONAL blog at the domain of the same name as myself, which doesn't change the fact that the name "otac0n" refers to me.  I'm not asking to be grandfathered in. Instead, I'm requesting a fair reading of the quoted rules section.  My view is that a personal blog doesn't meet the bar of a "website" in the context above (since it is used in contrast to the concept of an individual person), and that personal domain names likewise don't invalidate that individual person's name can be used as a username.

In addition, reading carefully the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking policy]], this block doesn't seem to be in line with the "preventative" nature spelled out within.  To my understanding, the only thing this block would be preventing is me representing myself as myself. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}