Jump to content

User talk:Ldavid1985

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RonBot (talk | contribs) at 17:04, 7 April 2019 ((Task 3) Adding {{Non free image to be reduced}} (disable)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ldavid1985! Thank you for your contributions. I am 78.26 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

78.26 (talk) 06:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your film edits

David, please step back a moment and take a breath in your quest to edit the leads to major films. First, read WP:LEAD to see if your edit is really "a summary of [the film's] most important aspects". Second, make sure your statement ("critical success" and other similar editorials) is actually reliably sourced in the body of the article and not just an inference you've made based on other facts. Third, make sure your edit is encyclopedic and not just gushing about how great the film was. I've reverted a lot of your edits, but I'm tiring of it, so as a new editor, you might want to go a little more slowly until you're more sure of your ground. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • David, while enthusiastic editors are more than welcome, it just wastes your time and ours if we have to revert most of what you've done. It is worth reading the links provided in the "Welome" message at the top your talk page. Some of the problems I have come across in your edits:
    • WP:OVERLINK – We don't every single phrase linked; readers know what "American" and "science fiction" is, so we don't generally link terms unless the context demands it.
    • WP:EGG links – Worse than overlinking, is when the the link doesn't take the reader to the topic they would expect; for example, on the Chinatown article you linked to the "greatest films of all time" page, but Chinatown isn't even included, so what's the point? Same goes for the "highest grossing films" article.
    • WP:PEACOCK – Phrases like "Rocky was a smash hit" are not encyclopedic. We use quantitative and qualitative descriptions on Wikipedia
    • WP:RS/IMDB – Generally IMDB is not regarded as a reliable source, because much of the info is user submitted. See WP:RELIABLE for more information on reliable sources.
    • WP:VERIFIABLE – All content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. You added content that was not sourced, and worse in some cases just plain wrong.
    • WP:ORIGINAL – All analysis must be sourced to external, published sources. As editors, we should not interject what we think into articles.
    • WP:LEAD – The lead is supposed to summarise the contents of the article, and should not inlcuded anything that isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. Leads for GA and FA rated articles are often carefully composed for this purpose. No-one should be adding fresh content to the lead unless it is added to the main body of the article too.
I appreciate all the guidelines can take some getting used to, but if you want to continue contributing you will have to abide by them from now on. Please read through the links provided before altering any more articles. Betty Logan (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Happy new year!
We wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 20:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Hello and thank you for your work here. We need to ask you to please stop using IMDb as a source for the changes that you are making in the infoboxes. They are not a reliable source for editing at wikipedia as they are a form of a Wiki that anyone can edit and their fact checking is spotty at best. Conversely, Box Office Mojo is a reliable source and that is why you will find them as the source for box office figures in many of our articles. If you have any questions please feel free to ask them here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Your help in this will be appreciated. MarnetteD | Talk 03:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I am trying to do three things at once. I see that you are also using The Numbers. They are another reliable source so good work. When you have time if you could just remove any IMDb cites that would be great. Thanks again for your time and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 03:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here Talk:The Shining (film)#Note.2Fquery on the Budget is a current conversation that may help you understand what I am trying to get at better than my posts so far. MarnetteD | Talk 03:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1968 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
1970 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
2001: A Space Odyssey (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Blade Runner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Cool Hand Luke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Fiddler on the Roof (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
First Blood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Funny Girl (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Murder on the Orient Express (1974 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Oliver! (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Ryan's Daughter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Aristocats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Owl and the Pussycat (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Sting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Verdict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Tora! Tora! Tora! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Yours, Mine and Ours (1968 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1971 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
1973 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
A Touch of Class (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Airport 1975 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Live and Let Die (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Magnum Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Paper Moon (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Robin Hood (1973 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Summer of '42 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Day of the Jackal (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Last Detail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Willard (1971 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1976 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Barbara Harris and The Numbers
1972 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
1975 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Barry Lyndon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Breakout (1975 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Deliverance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Family Plot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Funny Lady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Jeremiah Johnson (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
King Kong (1976 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Lady Sings the Blues (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Logan's Run (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Marathon Man (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Midway (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Murder by Death (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Rollerball (1975 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Shaft's Big Score (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Sounder (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Bad News Bears (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Getaway (1972 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Godfather (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Last House on the Left (1972 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Poseidon Adventure (1972 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Valachi Papers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Three Days of the Condor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
To Fly! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1977 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Dean Jones and The Numbers
1979 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to George Hamilton and The Numbers
...And Justice for All (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
1982 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
A Bridge Too Far (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Airport '77 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
All That Jazz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
American Graffiti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
An Unmarried Woman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Bedknobs and Broomsticks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Bullitt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Close Encounters of the Third Kind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Death Wish (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Five Easy Pieces (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
High Anxiety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Kingdom of the Spiders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Love at First Bite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Oh, God! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Pete's Dragon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Poltergeist (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Rocky II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Romeo and Juliet (1968 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Rosemary's Baby (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Saturday Night Fever (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Starting Over (1979 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Black Hole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Black Stallion (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Boys from Brazil (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Deep (1977 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Gauntlet (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Goodbye Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Lion in Winter (1968 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Muppet Movie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Turning Point (1977 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Way We Were (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The World's Greatest Athlete (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NCAA Track and Field Championship

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1977 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Dean Jones and The Numbers
1978 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Bullitt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alice's Restaurant (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Cactus Flower (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Easy Rider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Hello, Dolly! (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Paint Your Wagon (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
The Sterile Cuckoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
True Grit (1969 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Z (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1968 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Candy (1968 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Coogan's Bluff (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Star! (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
Where Were You When the Lights Went Out? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers
With Six You Get Eggroll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Carrie (1976 film), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The Towering Inferno . Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Terminator 2: Judgment Day shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --IllaZilla (talk) 07:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 1973 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allied Artists (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might consider putting something (anything) on your User page. It will get the red our of edit histories. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen () 12:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's your WP:User page. So it's more or less considered to be your personal space. I put in a suggestion. remove it if you like. Change it per your whim. You might look at other users' pages, as there are infinite possibilities. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen () 13:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hi. I have reverted some of your recent unverified edits. Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to A Man for All Seasons (1966 film). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bjenks (talk) 02:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Congratulations, Ldavid1985, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!

Thank you for helping improve film-related content, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of Family Guy characters. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strangers on a Train (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! The Old JacobiteThe '45 18:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1964 in film may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1979 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Rose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1964 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1963 in film may have broken the syntax by modifying 10 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Irma la Douce may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Cover = Irma_la_douce_(rykodisc.jpg

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

As per the MoS, please could you stop adding references to infoboxes? The information in the boxes should, where possible, reflect that which appears in the article, so such additions are unnecessary. Thank you. - SchroCat (talk) 05:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which bit of no references in infoboxes are you either struggling to understand, or think that this is something you don't need to worry about? Please stop doing this in the future. - SchroCat (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to U.S. Marshals (film), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Re: this (and others). Please read and inwardly digest the contents of WP:RS/IMDB. It covers the fact the IMDB is not a reliable source. You have been told this before, both on this talk page and in numerous edit summaries. Please stop adding information with no other supporting sources than this. - SchroCat (talk) 15:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist: The Movie

Hi. Regarding your edits to movie articles, including those on It Came From Outer Space and Zeitgeist: The Movie, you should know that websites with user-generated content, such as Patch Media, open forums, other wikis, personal blogs (except those written by recognized authorities who are considered reliable), are not reliable under WP:USERG, which is part of Wikipedia's Reliable Sources policy. This includes the Internet Movie Database, whose content is also user-generated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chapter Two (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hooky and Robert Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Catchfire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | language = English]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of years in film

Do not add back information without discussing it in-depth first; reverting other editors' edits (which have already been discussed and agreed on) is actually unconstructive. That being said, your edits on List of years in film from 1970-1979 have been reverted. Instead of leaving the same vague edit summaries, please share your thoughts on this discussion page as to why you believe the affected content should not be removed. Thanks, ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 18:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Film Poster for Head.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Film Poster for Head.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Laneco Brand Why Pay More Logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laneco Brand Why Pay More Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Film Poster for The Squall.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Film Poster for The Squall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Film Poster for To Fly!.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Film Poster for To Fly!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Film Poster for Daydreams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Film Poster for Daydreams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Angie Tribeca Promotional Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Angie Tribeca Promotional Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ldavid1985. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rocky II, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ldavid1985. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Thank You for Your Service (2017 film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhDv2.0 00:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ldavid1985. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]