Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Demoreasimpson16
Demoreasimpson16
Demoreasimpson16 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Demoreasimpson16/Archive.
08 April 2019
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- DemoreaBigD2020 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Obvious sockpuppet is obvious. Seriously though: this is, yet another, sockpuppet from Demorea. Clearly he isn't getting the message. Could we get an actual CU to check for sleepers (unlike previous SPIs) and possibly a long-standing rangeblock? These whack-a-mole blocks clearly aren't working. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 12:05 on April 8, 2019 (UTC)
- I have notified Bbb23 as he was the original blocking editor on the original Demoreasimpson16 account. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 12:08 on April 8, 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged, leaving open because requester asks for CU for sleepercheck. ST47 (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
CheckUser requested - per comments TheSandDoctor Talk 18:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)- Based on the history of this case, there is no reason to run a check. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
TheSandDoctor, ST47, Bbb23: With due respect to Bbb23, I have asked for CUs on each of the CUs for Demorea's socks and each time he has refused to check them or said there was no reason to check them. I am respectfully asking that a CU be ran. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:26 on April 9, 2019 (UTC)