User talk:Mccapra
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to our WikiProject
Hi Mccapra. I am the Lead Coordinator at Wikipedia:WikiProject History. I saw that you joined our WikiProject as a member recently. I would like to thank you for joining. Welcome!!
If I may, I would like to ask for your assistance. We are requesting input and assistance from all new members; our main reason for doing so is that this project has been semi-inactive for quite some time, and we are trying to get it to be fully active.
On that note, might you be able to go to the section below, and provide a brief introductory comment? you can feel free to let us know what type of items, topics, or articles you'd like to work on; or else, which areas of history you are most interested in; or else, you can simply say hello.
I hope that's okay? We would welcome any insights or input that you might like to share. We are going through a crucial period of reinstatement for WikiProject History at the current time, so right now, we are asking for "All hands on deck." You are welcome to add your comments at our talk page; or alternately, you can reply to me here if that is easier. We welcome any comments that you may have. Thanks for joining!! --Sm8900 (talk) 04:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Precious
dialogue and discourse
Thank you for quality articles such as Les Dialogues d’Evhémère, Discourse on Comets, Conventions of La Marsa and Siroe (Metastasio), for a well-organised user page grouped by topics, for improving articles, beginning in 2013 with Najm ad-Din Ayyub, for de-orphaning thousands of articles, - user versed and active in many languages, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2380 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Wow that's a great honour thank you very much! Mccapra (talk) 12:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for bothering you, but...
- New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 22:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi Mccapra. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. Mccapra (talk) 04:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for encouraging a newbie
The baclava and review of High Constabulary of the Port of Leith (Leith High Constables) is very much appreciated.Thank you and best wishes for your wiki-editing and reviewing!
{This is a new user}} Kaybeesquared (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Recent review
Hello Mccapra !
Thanks for reviewing Cabinet Dufaure II (France) ! You indicated that the article needed copy editing. If you could spare time, could you please indicate what part of the article (or perhaps is it all the article) needed it ? That would terribly help me improve it ! :)
Best regards, CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 09:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @CocoricoPolynesien: don’t worry about the tag on the article. The content is fine and it just needs a native speaker of English (or similar) to make some adjustments to wording. Wikipedia is a collaborative project so this tag is a cue to a future editor rather than a direction to you. If you carry on creating good articles like this other editors will deal with specific details. All the best Mccapra (talk) 12:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
Thanks for reviewing some of the articles I started - and for the positive feedback! I appreciate the effort :) Lajmmoore (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
Redirects
Hey Mccapra,
I've noticed that you've been blanking a lot of articles and swapping them for redirects. I know a lot of these are crappy company promotional articles, but some of the articles you've blanked (Pulsar 590, Web3S) have survived AFD and are arguably notable. I'm sure some others could've been merged, maybe Superword Level Parallelism into Automatic vectorization?
I'm just wondering, isn't this circumventing the AFD process? You've obviously got more experience than me and know your way around, but unceremoniously blanking articles just seems like throwing away information.Mbdfar (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi thanks for your note. I have been redirecting a lot of articles today and yesterday. They’re mostly unsourced or long-standing stubs. I did not realise that some have an AfD consensus to keep them so you’re quite right I should not have redirected them without going back to AfD first. I will go back and see which ones those are. It is possible that some could be merged yes, but I’d so that wasn’t obvious to me. I’m conscious that these articles have been sitting here for more than a decade without much development in most cases. In the case you pointed out I would not have the knowledge to undertake such a merge.
I’m very happy to review my work. I will try to find the articles that went to AfD the redirect. If there are any others you think I’ve made a mistake with please point them out. Many thanks Mccapra (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply - I don't mean to call you out or anything, I'm just trying to help de-orphan as well and wondering what I can get away with. Best of luck! Mbdfar (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Online retailing
When I made that page it was to redirect it to online shopping. Rolling back to that edit may be enough. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 10:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks, I’ve done that now. All the best Mccapra (talk) 11:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Prod removed
I removed your prod from [1] per edit summary rationale. I think this topic is likely notable, even through our article is a messy stub. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- ok thanks for letting me know. The sources in pl.wiki looked poor but I didn’t do a wider search in Polish. Mccapra (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Draft should be deleted
Good evening ! according to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Draft:Saif_Ben_Ammar should be deleted because the editor's name is Horcujet and Saif Ben Ammar known as Horcujet. You can check in the article. The same user has uploaded photos to commons . https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portait_of_saif_ben_ammar_(_hor_cujet_).png . then self promotion or paid. He doesn't even have a user page. I nominated the photo and article for speedy deletion.
Wikipedia:Autobiography: Avoid writing or editing an article about yourself (or paying someone else to do so), other than to correct unambiguous errors of fact. Writing an autobiography on Wikipedia is an example of conflict of interest editing and is strongly discouraged
--Eyatu Ben (talk) 12:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- ok thanks. I don’t have much experience with drafts and speedy deletion. If your speedy delete is declined, I suggest you read [2] before doing anything else. Also there’s no reason why people can’t upload photos of themselves to Commons, so long as they own the copyright (though another editor may come along afterwards and delete their contributions if they think they’re of no real value. Mccapra (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mccapra:: He doesn't even have a user page. Thank You for all --Eyatu Ben (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- ok thanks. I don’t have much experience with drafts and speedy deletion. If your speedy delete is declined, I suggest you read [2] before doing anything else. Also there’s no reason why people can’t upload photos of themselves to Commons, so long as they own the copyright (though another editor may come along afterwards and delete their contributions if they think they’re of no real value. Mccapra (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Merchant Republic
Thanks. I've deleted it as being created by a banned editor, but there's also a backstory which I've mentioned on your AfD. You can close it yourself now. Much appreciated, I'm kicking myself for having missed it. I've protected it also. Doug Weller talk 05:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Great thank you. It was total gibberish. I don’t know how to close an AfD so I’ll leave that to someone else. Mccapra (talk) 05:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Review of Thomas Arthur Rickard
Hi, I have had a notification that the page Thomas Arthur Rickard has been reviewed. Is there anywhere I can look to see what the result of the review is? Is there somewhere I can look to understand what the review process is that the page has undergone? Thanks, Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 09:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Tango Mike Bravo: Hi the New Page Review process is a way of checking that new articles are about topics that meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia, aren't copyright violations, and don't have major things wrong with them. I reviewed this article and could see that it passed all these thresholds. There isn't a report of the review, but if a new article is about something not notable or if it breaks copyright it can be sent to deletion. Otherwise reviewers add tags to it e.g. to request more sources, text cleanup or other modifications. By the way is this article based on a translation of the it.wiki article? If so I need to add a translation template onto its talk page. All the best Mccapra (talk) 10:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mccapra: Thank you for the explanation. I was inspired to write the article on Thomas Arthur Rickard because I found that he had been linked to the it.wiki article on List of fellows of Imperial College London which I created. However, although I now live in Italy, my Italian is not up to doing any translation, so I basically started from scratch in creating the page. So short answer, is no, it is not a translation. Why I created the list is a longer story. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK great no worries. I hope you find plenty of other interesting topics to write about. All the best Mccapra (talk) 12:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mccapra: Thank you for the explanation. I was inspired to write the article on Thomas Arthur Rickard because I found that he had been linked to the it.wiki article on List of fellows of Imperial College London which I created. However, although I now live in Italy, my Italian is not up to doing any translation, so I basically started from scratch in creating the page. So short answer, is no, it is not a translation. Why I created the list is a longer story. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks so much for reviewing many of my contributions. It's really appreciated by me, especially when it points out something I've missed or something I should improve. Thanks for the generosity of your time. Lajmmoore (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC) |
Thank you very much. That’s lovely. I enjoy reading your new articles and they’re all very well put together. I hope you continue finding good topics and digging out sources. All the best Mccapra (talk) 09:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Help
Hello Mccapra, they have nominated one of my notable pages for deletion, a very famous Tunisian youtuber Hachem Gaddouch and my article is notbale by sources I need your vote and your help. Thank you --Eyatu Ben (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Eyatu Ben: Hi ok I’ll take a look. But also, if pages are proposed for deletion you’re not supposed to encourage people to come and vote one way or the other. And if it does get deleted, don’t worry. I’ve had my work deleted too. I’d also encourage you not to spend time creating articles about Youtubers. YouTube is not a reliable source for Wikipedia and the sources for articles about Youtubers are usually a. YouTube (not acceptable) and b. Blogs and other unreliable online sources. It’s actually very hard to create articles about Youtubers with reliable sources, so if you focus in the, you’ll have a very frustrating time. And thank you very much indeed for the barnstar!! Much appreciated. Mccapra (talk) 04:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mccapra: Hi, Thank you for your reply. I only wrote one article on a notable youtuber, I am Tunisian and I like this actor youtuber, he is famous on my country, in addition you can see my articles, notable sources such as Tuniscope ... Thank you Mccapra --Eyatu Ben (talk) 04:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Eyatu Ben: ok I’ve looked and I’m afraid the article doesn’t have a single reliable source. Social media is never an acceptable source for Wikipedia, and neither is IMDB. Tuniscope isn’t either. It’s a ‘community’ that doesn’t rely on reports from proper journalists. I’d never heard of As-Sarih before but nothing I can see suggests it’s reliable either. Reliable sources would be independently-published books or scholarly papers/journals, or genuinely independent coverage (not interviews) by proper journalists in mainstream news media (e.g. As-Sabah, Al-Bayan, Jeune Afrique etc.). As I said it is usually very hard to find multiple reliable independent sources for Youtubers, so my best advice is to choose a different topic! If you want to save this article you have six days remaining now to find sources of the type I’ve mentioned. Mccapra (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mccapra: In Tunisia we don't have access to sources for talented young , in addition youtubeur is a new culture in our country, we also have Tuniscope is very notable in our country. I put in my article a source from Assarih.com. I don't think there are other sources, and I don't know him personally. maybe there are other sources not shown on google and he knows it? Thank you for your explanation. Thank you for valuable efforts for contributing to Wikipedia. nice to meet you Mccapra --Eyatu Ben (talk) 08:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thank you very much Eyatu Ben (talk) 02:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |