User talk:Eyatu Ben

Welcome!

Hello, Eya ben, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 12:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larbi Ben Salah Abid has been accepted

Larbi Ben Salah Abid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Eya ben

Thank you for creating Ali Riahi.

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember in the future to write a neutral tone in the future. Clearly identify that opinions are opinions and not facts.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam-2727: : Thank you for your explanation --Eya ben (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for creating the article about Metameur. Happy editing and let me know if you need any help. Mccapra (talk) 18:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: :Hi ! If i need help i will contact you, thank you very much , I am very happy --Eya ben (talk) 18:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for creating Sidi Brahim Riahi. Is this a translation of the Arabic or French Wikipedia pages? If so I need to add a translation template. Mccapra (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: :Thank you very much . I used both and the sources that I already acited. but more french wikipedia. --Eyatu Ben (talk) 20:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK whenever you use an article from another wiki as the basis for an en.wiki article it's important to record that fact on the article talk page. This preserves the chain of copyright across the wikipedia environment so we always know where material is sourced from, and don't end up with articles apparently materialising out of nowhere. The en.wiki article doesn't have to be a straight translation, but if you use the other article as the substantial basis for a new en.wiki article, you have to add this template. Most of the articles I create on en.wiki start life as an fr.wiki or it.wiki article, which I expand by adding other sources. It's much easier that starting completely from scratch. Anyway I'm going to add the translation template now to the talk page of Sidi Brahim Riahi now. You can copy this template yourself for the talk pages of future articles you translate.

Also you will see that I've already added project templates to the talk page for WikiProject Tunisia and WikiProject Biography. When you create articles in future, it's good if you can add relevant project templates to the talk page when you've finished creating the article. Leave the assessment fields empty - articles don't get assessed by their own creators. Adding project templates automatically adds your article to the worklist of an group of editors interested in the topic, who will get to work improving it and expanding it if possible. All the best Mccapra (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: : Thank you for information i will do that .

, some baklava for you. All the best --Eyatu Ben (talk) 11:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

hello , can you help me make my wikipage better

i dont have that much experience but i did my best respecting wiki rule

link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Saif_Ben_Ammar?fbclid=IwAR1ada7qJi-5mtKvz3oh9N5PGCDCdjSJ_RsLnP9NvUJstXZRqIiYlEiYpAE

and thank you so much . Horcujet (talk) 12:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Turki (Tunisia)

Hello, Eyatu Ben,

Thank you for creating Turki (Tunisia).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page s verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 22:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Meatsgains:: Hello, Okey thank you --Eyatu Ben (talk) 01:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tunivisions

The article Tunivisions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable , and nothing seems available to redirect to. "Gossip magazines" is wide genre & not a suitable redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Good Morning DGG, I solved the problem in the article you proposed to delete. you can check and remove the removal template Now. Thank you --Eyatu Ben (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hedi Donia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hedi Donia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae::Hello, Hedi Donia is a Tunisian heritage singer he is 90 years old --Eyatu Ben (talk) 01:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hachem Gaddouch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hachem Gaddouch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hachem Gaddouch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Chdondon1990 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I don't understand why did you block me ? I wrote articles about Tunisia I am new member for 2 weeks. Why did you block me for no reason? I have no other account this is my only account ! --Eyatu Ben (talk) 12:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #30210 was submitted on 2020-04-21 13:26:14. This review is now closed.

-- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the block message, above under "Blocked as a sockpuppet", and be sure you understand it before you make a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a member on Wikipedia for 2 weeks and I have written more than 25 articles for Tunisia my country, my goal is to have several articles on my country and become the best tunisian editor in Wikipedia. I have not used other accounts and chdondon is not me, I created several articles about my country including Metameur Ali Riahi Tamezret El Mdou Faïd Sidi Brahim Riahi Hachem Gaddouch Fatma Boussaha Chotrana Mahdia Marine Cemetery .... the topics i'm going to created about communes in Tunisia, artists, Historical figure and others. --Eyatu Ben (talk) 02:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why this block what I did ? I have been a member on Wikipedia for 2 weeks and I have written more than 25 articles for Tunisia my country, my goal is to have several articles on my country and become the best tunisian editor in Wikipedia. I have not used other accounts and chdondon is not me, I created several articles about my country including Metameur Ali Riahi Tamezret El Mdou Faïd Sidi Brahim Riahi Hachem Gaddouch Fatma Boussaha Chotrana Mahdia Marine Cemetery .... the topics i'm going to created about communes in Tunisia, artists, Historical figure and others. If you are not agree please i would like to delete all my articles. These are my articles, I am the one who wrote all these articles and in the end I find myself blocked for no reason. Eyatu Ben (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once you make an edit to Wikipedia, it belongs to Wikipedia and cannot be removed just because the user who made edits requests it; you are told this above the publish changes button when you edit: "By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL." Your request does not address the reason for the block, sockpuppetry, the use of multiple accounts. If you have not done so, you will need to provide an explanation as to why we think you are. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: : This is my one and only account on wikipedia I didn't understand why you said I used other account out that this is my only account. --Eyatu Ben (talk) 13:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my one and only account on wikipedia I didn't understand why you said I used other account out that this is my only account. I want a convincing explanation --Eyatu Ben (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= This is my one and only account on wikipedia I didn't understand why you said I used other account out that this is my only account. I want a convincing explanation --[[User:Eyatu Ben|Eyatu Ben]] ([[User talk:Eyatu Ben#top|talk]]) 13:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= This is my one and only account on wikipedia I didn't understand why you said I used other account out that this is my only account. I want a convincing explanation --[[User:Eyatu Ben|Eyatu Ben]] ([[User talk:Eyatu Ben#top|talk]]) 13:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= This is my one and only account on wikipedia I didn't understand why you said I used other account out that this is my only account. I want a convincing explanation --[[User:Eyatu Ben|Eyatu Ben]] ([[User talk:Eyatu Ben#top|talk]]) 13:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Someone else will review your request, but why would others think that you might be using another account if you are not? Please review the sockpuppet investigation. 331dot (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: : I don't know either Chdondon or Salah. What I understood by what I made modifications on the article Ahlem Fekih then you believe that I am Chdondon ? I found article Ahlem Ici , the only Tunisian article. so i'm making a vote. in addition i made change here --Eyatu Ben (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]