Jump to content

Michael Baigent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TrangaBellam (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 16 July 2020 (source add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Michael Baigent
Born
Michael Barry Meehan

27 February 1948
Nelson, New Zealand
Died17 June 2013(2013-06-17) (aged 65)
Brighton, England
EducationB.A. Psychology
M.A. in Mysticism and Religious Experience
Alma materUniversity of Kent
Occupation(s)author and lecturer
Known forCo-author The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail

Michael Baigent (born Michael Barry Meehan,[1] 27 February 1948 – 17 June 2013) was a pseudo-historian, who published a number of popular works questioning traditional perceptions of history and the life of Jesus. He is best known as a co-author of the book Holy Blood, Holy Grail.

Biography

Baigent was born in 1948 in Nelson, New Zealand[2] and spent his childhood in the nearby communities of Motueka and Wakefield. His father was a devout Catholic, and he was tutored in Catholic theology from the age of five years.[3] After his father left the family when Baigent was eight years old, he went to live with his maternal grandfather, Lewis Baigent and took his surname.[3] His great-grandfather, Henry Baigent served as a Nelson city mayor and had founded a forestry firm, H. Baigent and Sons.

His secondary schooling was at Nelson College, and then he moved on to the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, initially intending to study science and continue in the family career of forestry, but switched to studying comparative religion and philosophy.[3]

After graduating in 1972, Baigent made extensive travels to different countries, as a freelancer.[3] He did stints as a war-photographer in Laos and as a fashion-photographer in Spain, before arriving at England in 1976.[3] Whilst working at the BBC photographic department and staking in night shifts at a soft-drinks factory, he came across Richard Leigh via a TV producer who was producing a series on Knights Templar.[3][4] Leigh was to be his frequent co-author across his entire life, and together they sough to unravel the alleged mystery of Rennes-le-Château in France, whose details were put forward in Holy Blood, Holy Grail.[3]

In 2000, Baigent also earned an MA in Mysticism and Religious Experience at the University of Kent.[3] A Freemason and a Grand Officer (2005) of the United Grand Lodge of England, he was an editor of Freemasonry Today from Spring, 2001 to Summer, 2011 and advocated for a more liberal approach to Freemasonry.[4]

Baigent married Jane, an interior designer in 1982 and had two daughters, Isabelle and Tansy along with two children from her earlier marriage.[3] He died from a brain haemorrhage in Brighton, East Sussex in 2013.[4]

Works and reviews

Holy Blood, Holy Grail

Published on 18 January 1982, Holy Blood, Holy Grail popularised the hypothesis that the true nature of the quest for the Holy Grail was that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had a child together, the first of a bloodline which later married into a Frankish royal dynasty, the Merovingians, and was all tied together by a society known as the Priory of Sion. The theory that Jesus and Mary were in a carnal (physical) relationship is based on Baigent's interpretation of the Holy Kiss on the mouth (typically between males in early Christian times, thus signifying Mary's emancipation), and spiritual marriage, as given in the Gospel of Philip. It was earlier perpetuated by authors Laurence Gardner and Margaret Starbird.

The book rapidly climbed the bestseller charts, and had a sequel, The Messianic Legacy.

Reviews

Historian Marina Warner noted of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail to be filled with lurid falsehoods and distorted reasoning.[5] The day after the publication, the authors had a public clash on BBC television with the Bishop of Birmingham and Marina Warner.[6]

The book has been described as "a work thoroughly debunked by scholars and critics alike"[7] and it was called "one of the all-time great works of pop pseudohistory" in a review in The New York Times Book Review.[8] Arthurian scholar Richard Barber has commented, "It would take a book as long as the original to refute and dissect Holy Blood, Holy Grail point by point: it is essentially a text which proceeds by innuendo, not by refutable scholarly debate".[9]

Later, he and Leigh co-authored several books, including The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception (1991) in which they primarily followed the controversial theories of Robert Eisenman concerning the interpretation of the Scrolls. This[clarification needed] was discredited by Otto Betz and Rainer Riesner in their book Jesus, Qumran and The Vatican: Clarifications (1994).[10]

Dan Brown lawsuit

Some of the ideas presented in Baigent's earlier book Holy Blood, Holy Grail, were incorporated in the bestselling American novel The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown.[11]

In The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown named the primary antagonist, a British Royal Historian, Knight of the Realm and Grail scholar, Sir Leigh Teabing, KBE, also known as the Teacher, in homage to the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail. The name combines Richard Leigh's surname with 'Teabing', an anagram of Baigent.[12]

In March 2006, Baigent and Leigh filed a lawsuit in a British court against Brown's publisher, Random House, claiming copyright infringement.[13]

Concurrent with the plagiarism trial, Baigent released a new book, The Jesus Papers, amid criticism[by whom?] that it was just a reworking of themes from Holy Blood, Holy Grail, and timed to capitalize on the marketing hype around the release of the movie The Da Vinci Code, as well as the attention brought by the trial. In the postscript to the book (p. 355), Baigent points out that the release date had been set by Harper Collins long before.

On 7 April 2006, High Court judge Peter Smith rejected the copyright-infringement claim by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, and Dan Brown won the court case. On 28 March 2007, Baigent and Leigh lost their appeal against this decision and were faced with legal bills of about 3 million pounds.[14]

The Inquisition

Bernard Hamilton, writing in the English Historical Review, described Baigent's treatment of The Inquisition as pursuing "a very outdated and misleading account", which ignored all modern development in Inquisition Studies and grossly exaggerated its power and influence, to the extent of being polemical.[15] Writing in the Spectator magazine, Piers Paul Read deemed the authors to have penned a misinformed diatribe against Catholicism, with nil interest in "understanding the subtleties and paradoxes in the history of the Inquisition".[16]

Baigent himself conceded that none of his theories yielded any positive results: "I would like to think in due course a lot of this material will be proven," he said, "but it’s just a hope of mine."[17]

Publications

Sole author

  • From the Omens of Babylon: Astrology and Ancient Mesopotamia (1994) ISBN 0-14-019480-0. 2nd edition published as Astrology in Ancient Mesopotamia: The Science of Omens and the Knowledge of the Heavens (2015) ISBN 978-1591432210
  • Ancient Traces: Mysteries in Ancient and Early History (1998) ISBN 0-670-87454-X
  • The Jesus Papers: Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up in History (2006) ISBN 0-06-082713-0
  • Racing Toward Armageddon: The Three Great Religions and the Plot to End the World (2009)

Co-written with Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln

Co-written with Richard Leigh

Co-written with other authors

  • The Astrological Journal (Winter 1983–84, Vol. 26, No. 1) with Roy Alexander, Fiona Griffiths, Charles Harvey, Suzi Lilley-Harvey, Esme Williams, David Hamblin, and Zach Mathews, 1983
  • Mundane Astrology: Introduction to the Astrology of Nations and Groups (co-written with Nicholas Campion and Charles Harvey) 1984 (reissued expanded edition, 1992)
  • Freemasonry Today, (editor) 2001-2011

See also

References

  1. ^ Obituaries, page 15, The Bulletin, The Magazine of the Nelson College Community, December 2013 [1]
  2. ^ Tait, Morgan (21 June 2013). "NZ author dies of brain haemorrhage". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 30 June 2013.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Stanford, Peter (30 June 2013). "Michael Baigent obituary". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  4. ^ a b c Hamill, John (5 September 2013). "Michael Baigent obituary". Freemasonry Today. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
  5. ^ The Times, 18 January 1982.
  6. ^ Milne, Jonathan (12 March 2006). "The Kiwi trying to break the Code". Herald on Sunday. Retrieved 23 October 2011.
  7. ^ Elizabeth Sherr Sklar, Donald L. Hoffman (editors), King Arthur In Popular Culture, page 214 (McFarland & Company, Inc., 2002). ISBN 0-7864-1257-7
  8. ^ Miller, Laura (22 February 2004). "The Da Vinci Con". New York Times.
  9. ^ cited in Richard Barber, "The Search for Sources: The Case of the Grail", in Norris J. Lacy, editor, A History of Arthurian Scholarship, page 34 (D. S. Brewer, 2006). ISBN 978-1-84384-069-5
  10. ^ London: SCM Press, 1994.
  11. ^ NZ author claims copyright breach in Da Vinci Code, 28 February 2006
  12. ^ Slotnik, Daniel (22 June 2013). "Michael Baigent, Writer Who Sued Over 'Da Vinci Code,' Dies at 65". New York Times. Retrieved 29 June 2013.
  13. ^ Kiwi author takes on Dan Brown, 1 March 2006
  14. ^ see Guardian article
  15. ^ Hamilton, Bernard (2001). "Review of The Inquisition". The English Historical Review. 116 (466): 474–475. ISSN 0013-8266.
  16. ^ Read, Piers Paul (1 January 2000). "Lies, damned lies and statistics". The Spectator Archive. Retrieved 16 July 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  17. ^ DaVinci, other books fit conspiracy fixation
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baigent&oldid=968001108"