User talk:lensovet
Moscow Metro
You signed Elk Salmon's name on the talk page. This is ridiculous!
How do you suggest I post in Apple related categories?
I am an authorized Apple reseller and am one of only about 3-4 known U.S. based companies actively shipping globally to buyers in Europe, Asia, Latin America, etc. I provide an incredibly valuable service to my buyers, ship via FedEx International Priority, and sell more than $2 million in Apple products/year through my website, eBay, Amazon, price indexing sites, CPC advertising, etc. I posted a link in your entry for the iPod Mini that stated we ship globally and offer the very few remaining Apple iPods with full warranties to any buyer around the globe. Do you not think it worthwhile to offer these to buyers overseas who chance upon the Wiki for iPod Minis? They cannot/are not allowed to buy them through the Apple.com domain if they are outside the U.S. and Canada. I find it unfair to list Apple.com as a domain (they sell stuff - they are a commercial enterprise and that is what the post is about - a commercial product) or external link, but not offer an alternative to the 5.7 billion people living outside North America who cannot buy from the Apple.com website. Many countries throughout the world are not on Apple's direct sales list, and hence are charged double (or more) the retail price. I generally mark my iPods for sale @ U.S. retail plus international express shipping. That's it. I'm very proud of the business I maintain and honor and respect my buyers.
I'd like to be able to amicably find a way to reference myself (and even other competitors - I have no qualms about having someone else's link out there) as a viable option and let the reader determine if I'm a viable source through email/phone, references, etc. If I'm not even included in a Wiki, they're left trying to sift through countless scammers, etc. to find a legitimate way to buy an iPod without losing a fortune or being defrauded.
I previously worked for eBay Trust and Safety (2 years). I did fraud prevention and saw that the count on eBay for iPod listings was/is about 6-8x as many scammers without iPods (for every one that is legitimate).
Please let me know if you feel it's worth mentioning in any way that there are still viable suppliers of iPod minis with Apple warranties that ship these to buyers for a very good price.
Regards,
Chet Ranger President, US to UK dealusmaximus.com
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Lensovet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BART ticket.png
Thank you for uploading File:BART ticket.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |