User talk:Growlies
Welcome!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pretty Hattie's Baby (May 31)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pretty Hattie's Baby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Growlies,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Daniel kenneth (talk) 18:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pretty Hattie's Baby (June 11)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pretty Hattie's Baby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your draft article, Draft:Pretty Hattie's Baby
[edit]
Hello, Growlies. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pretty Hattie's Baby".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Casting couch - talk page discussion regarding possible WP:BLP issues
[edit]I've started a talk page discussion on the Casting couch article regarding concerns that the article might violate the Biographies of living persons policy.
Since you've made many edits to the article, I thought you might like to contribute to the discussion. Neiltonks (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of proven or alleged pre-Weinstein historical sexual assaults in the entertainment industry for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of proven or alleged pre-Weinstein historical sexual assaults in the entertainment industry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of proven or alleged pre-Weinstein historical sexual assaults in the entertainment industry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 21:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
"you're so unhelpful"
[edit]I know it must seem to you like I'm being unhelpful. You think you know something about J&B and you want to add it to Wikipedia. I'm telling you it's a piece of trivia that doesn't belong in a well-organized article about the company. I'm not going to delete your "in popular culture" section, but someone probably will eventually. Or maybe add that sometimes whiskey bottles in the Simpsons look like J&B bottles. You never know with Wikipedia. :) World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Cheers! Growlies (talk) 15:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Re: Sexual abuse in Hollywood
[edit]Hi! Thank you for the congratulations, though I must say that most of it comes from an article in the Spanish Wikipedia made by user 13 miedos (talk) (I say "most of it" because it contained some glaring errors and controversial sentences that could've easily used non-controversial sentences instead; though it seems that ever since I created "Sexual abuse in Hollywood" in the English Wikipedia, that article in Spanish was rectified to adhere more to the English article).
Anyway, about the old version of the "Casting couch" page, it sure seems insteresting. I understand why most of it was cut out, between most post-Weistein accusations (such as the Canada section) going to the Weinstein effect page (Weinstein effect now having its own template of related articles) and a quite considerable amount of accusations actually not having references (not even a "citation needed"), but it does still have a not at all ignorable amount of info. I'll give it a look. Maybe restructure and retitle the article to include the examples from outside the U.S. or create a new article outright. In any case, thank you again for the tip. Cheers!--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Cool. Many of the older allegations never developed into legal cases or media scandals. I tried to create a new article last year but it was deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_proven_or_alleged_pre-Weinstein_historical_sexual_assaults_in_the_entertainment_industryGrowlies (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- I think that I should notify you than an user has kindly restored a vast amount of the content deleted in "Casting couch" (the user who removed it turns out to have been blocked), even though it excluded all previous accusations that 1) Came from autobiographies, personal blogs, etc. 2) Were not covered by secondary, reliable sources 3) Didn't explicitly use the term "casting couch" in the description of the event/story, and 5) Did end in a legal conviction or a clear admission by the accused party. On an unrelated note, it would be recommendable that any time you answer somebody, do so on that other person's talk page, so that way they can be notified of your replies. I for one didn't see the reply you wrote above.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- You're welcome!--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think that I should notify you than an user has kindly restored a vast amount of the content deleted in "Casting couch" (the user who removed it turns out to have been blocked), even though it excluded all previous accusations that 1) Came from autobiographies, personal blogs, etc. 2) Were not covered by secondary, reliable sources 3) Didn't explicitly use the term "casting couch" in the description of the event/story, and 5) Did end in a legal conviction or a clear admission by the accused party. On an unrelated note, it would be recommendable that any time you answer somebody, do so on that other person's talk page, so that way they can be notified of your replies. I for one didn't see the reply you wrote above.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Discrimination based on skin color, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Growlies. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
February 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Lard Almighty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Georges Perec have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hyperreality. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Haiku, you may be blocked from editing. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jacques Rancière. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll be more careful. Spanish Wikipedia was also bombarded with his "scholarship": https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:.Sergio/Informe_sobre_AVR Growlies (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |