Jump to content

Genome survey sequence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

In the fields of bioinformatics and computational biology, Genome survey sequences (GSS) are nucleotide sequences similar to expressed sequence tags (ESTs) that the only difference is that most of them are genomic in origin, rather than mRNA.[1]

Genome survey sequences are typically generated and submitted to NCBI by labs performing genome sequencing and are used, amongst other things, as a framework for the mapping and sequencing of genome size pieces included in the standard GenBank divisions.[1]

Contributions

Genome survey sequencing is a new way to map the genome sequences since it is not dependent on mRNA. Current genome sequencing approaches are mostly high-throughput shotgun methods, and GSS is often used on the first step of sequencing. GSSs can provide an initial global view of a genome, which includes both coding and non-coding DNA and contain repetitive section of the genome unlike ESTs. For the estimation of repetitive sequences, GSS plays an important role in the early assessment of a sequencing project since these data can affect the assessment of sequences coverage, library quality and the construction process.[2] For example, in the estimation of dog genome, it can estimate the global parameters, such as neutral mutation rate and repeat content.[3]

GSS is also an effective way to large-scale and rapidly characterizing genomes of related species where there is only little gene sequences or maps.[4] GSS with low coverage can generate abundant information of gene content and putative regulatory elements of comparative species.[5] It can compare these genes of related species to find out relatively expanded or contracted families. And combined with physical clone coverage, researchers can navigate the genome easily and characterize the specific genomic section by more extensive sequencing.[3]

Limitation

The limitation of genomic survey sequence is that it lacks long-range continuity because of its fragmentary nature, which makes it harder to forecast gene and marker order. For example, to detect repetitive sequences in GSS data, it may not be possible to find out all the repeats since the repetitive genome may be longer than the reads, which is difficult to recognize.[2]

Types of data

The GSS division contains (but is not limited to) the following types of data:

Random "single pass read" genome survey sequences

Random “single pass read” genome survey sequences is GSSs that generated along single pass read by random selection. Single-pass sequencing with lower fidelity can be used on the rapid accumulation of genomic data but with a lower accuracy.[6] It includes RAPD, RFLP, AFLP and so on.[7]

Cosmid/BAC/YAC end sequences

Cosmid/BAC/YAC end sequences use Cosmid/Bacterial artificial chromosome/Yeast artificial chromosome to sequence the genome from the end side. These sequences act like very low copy plasmids that there is only one copy per cell sometimes. To get enough chromosome, they need a large number of E. coli culture that 2.5 - 5 litres may be a reasonable amount.[8]

Cosmid/BAC/YAC can also be used to get bigger clone of DNA fragment than vectors like plasmid and phagemid. A larger insert is often helpful for the sequence project in organizing clones. [9]

Eukaryotic proteins can be expressed by using YAC with posttranslational modification.[10] BAC can’t do that, but BACs can reliably represent human DNA much better than YAC or cosmid.[11]

Exon trapped genomic sequences

Exon trapped sequence is used to identify genes in cloned DNA, and this is achieved by recognizing and trapping carrier containing exon sequence of DNA. Exon trapping has two main features: First, it is independent of availability of the RNA expressing target DNA. Second, isolated sequences can be derived directly from clone without knowing tissues expressing the gene which needs to be identified.[12] During slicing, exon can be remained in mRNA and information carried by exon can be contained in the protein. Since fragment of DNA can be inserted into sequences, if an exon is inserted into intron, the transcript will be longer than usual and this transcript can be trapped by analysis.

Alu PCR sequences

Alu repetitive element is member of Short Interspersed Elements (SINE) in mammalian genome. There are about 300 to 500 thousand copies of Alu repetitive element in human genome, which means one Alu element exists in 4 to 6 kb averagely. Alu elements are distributed widely in mammalian genome, and repeatability is one of the characteristics, that is why it is called Alu repetitive element. By using special Alu sequence as target locus, specific human DNA can be obtained from clone of TAC, BAC, PAC or human-mouse cell hybrid.

PCR is an approach used to clone a small piece of fragment of DNA. The fragment could be one gene or just a part of gene. PCR can only clone very small fragment of DNA, which generally does not exceed 10kbp.

Alu PCR is a "DNA fingerprinting" technique. This approach is rapid and easy to use. It is obtained from analysis of many genomic loci flanked by Alu repetitive elements, which are non-autonomous retrotransposons present in high number of copies in primate genomes.[13] Alu element can be used for genome fingerprinting based on PCR, which is also called Alu PCR.

There are several ways to analyze the function of a particular gene sequence, the most direct method is to replace it or cause a mutation and then to analyze the results and effects. There are three method are developed for this purpose: gene replacement, sense and anti-sense suppression, and insertional mutagenesis. Among these methods, insertional mutagenesis was proved to be very good and successful approach.

At first, T-DNA was applied for insertional mutagenesis. However, using transposable element can bring more advantages. Transposable elements were first discovered by Barbara McClintock in maize plants. She identified the first transposable genetic element, which she called the Dissociation (Ds) locus.[14] The size of transposable element is between 750 and 40000bp. Transposable element can be mainly classified as two classes: One class is very simple, called insertion sequence (IS), the other class is complicated, called transposon. Transposon has one or several characterized genes, which can be easily identified. IS has the gene of transposase.

Transposon can be used as tag for a DNA with a know sequence. Transposon can appear at other locus through transcription or reverse transcription by the effect of nuclease. This appearance of transposon proved that genome is not statistical, but always changing the structure of itself.

There are two advantages by using transposon tagging. First, if a transposon is inserted into a gene sequence, this insertion is single and intact. The intactness can make tagged sequence easily to molecular analysis. The other advantage is that, many transposons can be found eliminated from tagged gene sequence when transposase is analyzed. This provides confirmation that the inserted gene sequence was really tagged by transposon.[15]

Example of GSS file

The following is an example of GSS file that can be submitted to GenBank:[16]

TYPE: GSS
STATUS:  New
CONT_NAME: Sikela JM
GSS#: Ayh00001
CLONE: HHC189
SOURCE: ATCC
SOURCE_INHOST: 65128
OTHER_GSS:  GSS00093, GSS000101
CITATION: 
Genomic sequences from Human 
brain tissue
SEQ_PRIMER: M13 Forward
P_END: 5'
HIQUAL_START: 1
HIQUAL_STOP: 285
DNA_TYPE: Genomic
CLASS: shotgun
LIBRARY: Hippocampus, Stratagene (cat. #936205)
PUBLIC: 
PUT_ID: Actin, gamma, skeletal
COMMENT:
SEQUENCE:
AATCAGCCTGCAAGCAAAAGATAGGAATATTCACCTACAGTGGGCACCTCCTTAAGAAGCTG
ATAGCTTGTTACACAGTAATTAGATTGAAGATAATGGACACGAAACATATTCCGGGATTAAA
CATTCTTGTCAAGAAAGGGGGAGAGAAGTCTGTTGTGCAAGTTTCAAAGAAAAAGGGTACCA
GCAAAAGTGATAATGATTTGAGGATTTCTGTCTCTAATTGGAGGATGATTCTCATGTAAGGT
GCAAAAGTGATAATGATTTGAGGATTTCTGTCTCTAATTGGAGGATGATTCTCATGTAAGGT
TGTTAGGAAATGGCAAAGTATTGATGATTGTGTGCTATGTGATTGGTGCTAGATACTTTAAC
TGAGTATACGAGTGAAATACTTGAGACTCGTGTCACTT
||

References

  1. ^ a b GenBank Flat File 96.0 Release Notes
  2. ^ a b Otto, Thomas D., et al. "ReRep: Computational detection of repetitive sequences in genome survey sequences (GSS)." Bmc Bioinformatics 9.1 (2008): 366.
  3. ^ a b Kirkness, E. F. (2003-09-26). "The Dog Genome: Survey Sequencing and Comparative Analysis". Science. 301 (5641). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS): 1898–1903. Bibcode:2003Sci...301.1898K. doi:10.1126/science.1086432. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 14512627. S2CID 22366556.
  4. ^ Venkatesh, Byrappa, et al. "Survey sequencing and comparative analysis of the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) genome." PLoS biology 5.4 (2007): e101.
  5. ^ Hitte, Christophe, et al. "Facilitating genome navigation: survey sequencing and dense radiation-hybrid gene mapping." Nature Reviews Genetics 6.8 (2005): 643-648.
  6. ^ "DNA sequencing How to determine the sequence of bases in a DNA molecule". Archived from the original on 2013-10-21. Retrieved 2013-10-21.
  7. ^ DDBJ-GSS
  8. ^ MEGA- and GIGA preps of cosmid-, BAC-, PAC, YAC-, and P1-DNA with JETSTAR 2.0
  9. ^ "WSSP-04 Chapter 2 – Vectors" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-23. Retrieved 2013-10-22.
  10. ^ Yeast artificial chromosome
  11. ^ Venter, J. Craig, Hamilton O. Smith, and Leroy Hood. "A New Cooperative Strategy for Sequencing the Human and Other Genomes."
  12. ^ Martin C. Wapenaar; Johan T. Den Dunnen (2001). Exon Trapping: Application of a Large-Insert Multiple-Exon-Trapping System. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 175. pp. 201–215. doi:10.1385/1-59259-235-X:201. ISBN 978-1-59259-235-7. PMID 11462836.
  13. ^ Cardelli M (2011). "Alu PCR". PCR Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 687. pp. 221–9. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-944-4_15. ISBN 978-1-60761-943-7. PMID 20967611.
  14. ^ Tsugeki R, Olson ML, Fedoroff NV (May 2007). "Transposon tagging and the study of root development in Arabidopsis". Gravitational and Space Biology. 11 (2): 79–87. PMID 11540642.
  15. ^ Ramachandran S, Sundaresan V (2001). "Transposons as tools for functional genomics". Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 39 (3–4): 243–252. doi:10.1016/s0981-9428(01)01243-8.
  16. ^ dbGSS_submit