Jump to content

Talk:Asian fashion doll

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Attempt to clean up the list of dolls

Changing the title of the list from "see also" to "Examples of Asian fashion dolls". Removing all the redlinks, retaining links to those articles that actually exist. Removing latidoll and souldoll from the list, since I think they are more commonly and accurately classified as ball-jointed dolls, and they are listed in the ball-jointed doll article. Adding a more proper "see also" section with links to fashion doll and and ball-jointed doll.Siawase (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Moved article from plural title Asian fashion dolls to singular Asian Fashion doll, per Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Prefer singular nouns. Edited links on articles linking to the plural title.Siawase (talk) 14:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing pullip variants

Removing variants of pullip dolls from the list:

  • Dal Doll by Chunsang Chunha and Jun Planning
  • TaeYang ("Pullip's boyfriend") by Chunsang Chunha and Jun Planning

The main pullip entry remains, and I think it's enough that the related dolls are mentioned in the pullip article.

Some other dolls, like the ones from Sonokong and Sekiguchi could possibly be conflated also, but I don't know enough about them to do so. It would be really great if someone who are familiar with these dolls could add some details about them.Siawase (talk) 14:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly non-notable dolls

I removed the following dolls from the article since they are possibly not WP:NOTABLE. I left those where I could find any sort of related article on wikipedia, in english or other language. I also tentatively left annz since they were referred to in the prose above the list.

  • Ingrid ("finest vinyl" dolls) by JOETAI[1]
  • J-doll by Jun Planning[2]
  • Marmit
  • Nippon Misaki (Jason Wu/Fashion Royalty Nippon) by Integrity Toys
  • Rune by Sekiguchi
  • Susie ("Asian American") by RnD Dolls
  • YeunJi by Sonokong

Siawase (talk) 13:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • note: I readded Kurhn which you removed without doing any research. I put a reference to the official site this time since you requested it. It belongs because a.) it is a notable doll from China and b.) the asian fashion doll list currently does not include a chinese doll. Kurhn does not currently have a page on the English wiki, but it is IS NOTABLE. Not having a wiki page yet does not make something not notable. -- NatsukiGirl\talk
Please to try assume good faith. The above post is five months old and about other brands. Before removing Kurhn I searched google which just gave a bunch of resellers [1] and google news came up with nothing [2] (and google news indexes Chinese language sources as well.) Doing a google search with a different keyword show some brief coverage by fans.[3] but Wikipedia's notability guideline requires coverage from reliable sources, which fan blogs are not, and independent of the subject, which an official site is not. There is no way to verify that this doll brand is more important to mention than any other Chinese fashion doll brand. Siawase (talk) 10:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, searching google news for "可儿娃娃"[4] (the title of kurhn.com - I guess it would translate to "Foshan Kurhn" but I don't know Chinese) came up with what looks like a few secondary reliable sources with some brief coverage: [5][6][7] I added the first one (with the images) to the article as a secondary source. The other ones mostly seemed to deal with the economical aspects (at least from what I could glean using google translate.) Siawase (talk) 10:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Excust me, but Foshan is a place called 佛山 in Guangdong, and 'doll' in Chinese is 娃娃. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.178.214.128 (talk) 10:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ JoeTaiDoll site
  2. ^ http://www.jun-doll.com/index.php?doll=j-doll&cr= J-doll at Jun-doll.com, official Jun Planning site

Don't forget some of dolls for children

Mimi from Mimiworld, and Jouju from Young Toys, although they're looks similar to Jenny, they still have a main represent of fashion dolls in Korea children (like Fulla in Middle East), evel Jouju has her own Magical Girl cartoon called Secret Jouju now! So add them into the list, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.145.89 (talk) 02:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. We need independent reliable sources, like a newspaper or magazine that covered them, to establish the notability of the dolls to include them here. Siawase (talk) 12:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jouju's link: http://www.youngtoys.co.kr/english/html/02_jouju_front.html Mimi's link: https://www.youtube.com/user/zidream70/videos?shelf_id=1&view=0&sort=dd (you need to have more patient to find the products of Mimi doll... ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.178.214.128 (talk) 10:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Asian fashion doll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]