The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
What does this mean "a variant of the B-29 tail"? It has a generally Boeing-style tail, like a P-38 and Constellation and a Hudson all have distinctly "Lockheed" twin tails. That doesn't mean they "gave the Constellation a P-38 tail", it means that is the design the company chooses, both for performance and for brand recognition. The B-29 has a tail that is identical to the B-17, so wouldn't it be more accurate to say they gave it a B-17 tail? Although the original B-17 used a much different tail, without the fillet. The B-29 is much closer to the B-17 than the XF8B is to the B-29. The only similarity that is evident is that it follows a generally similar curved shape, but the proportions and shape are totally different. For that matter, the Privateer has a tail much more like the B-29 than this plane has. So did the B-32, and the B-36 if I recall correctly.
