The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I have no problem with the "keep" - but could someone please add some independent reliable sources? They were mentioned, but I don't see much in the way of sourcing here! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reversed the NPOV paragraph. Any reasonable person can see that an article written by Company A and hosted on at CompanyA.com, where Company A is an extremely small competitor in a market where Company B holds the greatest market share, is inherently biased. Whether such an article is accurate or not, its inclusion as a primary source in a Wikipedia entry is inappropriate. 174.25.231.245 (talk) 01:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reversed the reversal. The alleged NPOV paragraph is a reasonable and objective assessment of undisputed facts reported by an industry watchdog. It's clear that Findlaw (Company B) is attempting to white-wash its Wikipedia page of any independent or critical sources.
.svg?lang=en){kind=icon}
