Talk:Shaka era

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Southeast Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in September 2013.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Are the shalivahana and satvahana same Satvahna Gautamiputra satkarni has taken title "sakayavanpallavnidusana" i.e. destroyer of saka, yavana and pallava. If satvahanas were sakas why would they take title like this?

Man I am confused if Gautamiputra satkarni was saka or satavahana king. I got this piece of info "Gautamiputra Satakarni was the most famous king in this dynasty (satavahana). He defeated the Sakas(Scythian), Yavanas (Greeks) and Pahlavas (Parithans)" from http://www.geocities.com/narenp/history/history/stvhan.htm

Actual founder of the Saka era

It seems fairly clear that the actual founder of the Saka era was the Western Kshatrapa king Chastana and not a Satavahana king. Chastana was the founder of the Kardamaka dynasty (most of the kings we call the Western Kshatrapas belonged to this dynasty) and his successors used the Saka era in dating their coins and inscriptions. It is natural that they would use the regnal date of their founder as their era, not a date created by their sworn enemy, the Satavahana king.

I suggest we have a separate entry for Saka era that adheres to the current scholarly opinion and let this entry stand separately.

Rani nurmai (talk) 11:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

INDIAN CALENDER SYSTEMS - I HAVE ONE SOURCE AND IT STATES THE FOLLOWING:

- abiseka (Asoka), licchavi, thakuri, gupta, kalacuri, valabhi, harsa, maratha, buddhist and jain(virasamvat), Calukya (vikramaditya II).

- Saka from Koni Saka the Kushan/Salivahana/Nahapana. 78 AD.

- Vikrama or Malava 57 AD.

there is a dispute over the saka calender being founded by the salivahana. and why would Koni Saka want another when he could make one of his own. please respond as most evidence points to Koni Saka being the legitimate founder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.210.45.191 (talk) 16:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]