User talk:Deliogul

; Archives
	Please create a new section instead of editing the archive page Deliogul 15:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] ; Archives: User talk:Deliogul/Archive 1; User talk:Deliogul/Archive 2;

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Leave your messages or comments freely here

Re:

WP:ANI, but that is not even necessary, any admin probably would ban him, just contact one. I want to ignore these at the moment, there might be something bigger going on here. I have my suspicions, but I don't want to spell them out now, as they are just suspicions atm. Also Image: Turgut Ozal.jpg might need another fair use rationale for its use on the list of Turkish presidents. Deniz^T_C 18:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Turgut Ozal.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Turgut Ozal.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 04:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey

Şu Alman moderatör bana kafayı taktığı için yazdığım herşeyi bozuyor. Bir zahmet Turkey article'ında Ahmet Tolga Tek'in yazdıklarını geri getirebilir misin (Yunanlı salağın Foreign Relations kısmına yazdığı gereksiz/yanlış şey de revertlenmiş olur). İlaveten koyduğun yeni haritayı da eklemeyi unutma. Çok sağol.

Ottoman Empire

Hi Deliogul,

As per your request, I added my sig as an interested Wikipedian for the Ottoman project. Hiberniantears 21:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yakup Pasha

aka Maestro Jacopo, b. in Gaeta (Italy), died 1481

http://www.dallog.com/tdsa/hukumdarlar/fatih.htm

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Fatih+Sultan+Mehmed+Yakup&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%3Ffr%3Dyfp-t%26p%3D&fr=yfp&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu7QEsgNHB3EBty9XNyoA?p=Fatih+Sultan+Mehmed+Jacopo&fr=yfp

Warsword 14:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi Deliogul, I'm simply following WP:BAN. Banned users are not allowed to edit wikipedia even if the edits are constructive. Flavious should have thought about this before he evaded his 1 week block, which ultimately led to an indef. Regarding your revert on the Turkey article, I will assume good faith and not revert you. But be aware that editing on behalf of blocked users is prohibited. Regards. VartanM 20:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As ar as I know, it is "an editor can revert a banned/blocked editor, during the period s/he is banned". So you can revert with no complications (like 3rr, edit warring stuff), but you are not obliged to, as far as I can see. But, reinstating a banned editor's edits might have undesirable causes. We also have this: "Wikipedians are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned user, an activity sometimes called "proxying," unless they are able to confirm that the changes are verifiable and have independent reasons for making them." Deniz^T_C 15:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image

Deliogul please check Image:Misak-ı milli new(2).PNG, an image you uploaded. As far as I know Hatay wasn;t part of Misak i Milli (though I might be wrong). Also it might be better to shade the regions whose 'futures were going to be determined by referenda' Did you use MS Paint or some mapping software? I don't have a mapping software. Deniz^T_C 15:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Simply Red - Holding Back the Years.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Simply Red - Holding Back the Years.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ahmet Koc- Paradoks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ahmet Koc- Paradoks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Akarsu Islak Islak.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Akarsu Islak Islak.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

So what's up? Baristarim 05:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edits to Ataturk

Deliogul, I'd like to suggest minor editorial edits to correct errors in grammar and tighten language on the Ataturk page. The edits are not to change content. I'm new to wiki editing and that page is semi-blocked. How can I best get my suggestions to you? Some examples of edits I'd propose are below.

"Mustafa Kemal was born in the Ottoman city of Salonika (Turkish: Selânik, modern-day Thessaloniki, Greece) from Ali Rıza Efendi and Zübeyde Hanım." The phrase "from Ali Riza Efendi ..." should be "to Ali Riza Efendi..."

"He went to the military schools of Selânik and Manastır (present-day Bitola, Republic of Macedonia)" is better phrased as "He attended military schools in Selânik and ..."

"Mustafa Kemal to Latife Uşaklıgil." is not a complete sentence and should be changed to something like "Mustafa Kemal married Latife Uşaklıgil, but they divorced after 3 years of marriage."

"Atatürk had seven adopted daughters and an adopted son." This sentence can be written more tightly as "Ataturk adopted seven daughters and a son."

"In times of leisure, he mainly enjoyed reading, horse riding, chess, and swimming. He was very interested in dancing, taking pleasure in waltz on almost every opportunity, as well as the traditional Zeybek folk dances." Suggested change: "In his leisure time, he enjoyed reading, horseback riding, chess and swimming. He was also an avid dancer, and enjoyed dancing both the waltz and traditional Zeybek folk dances."

Redlining the text and sending it to you in a word document would be most efficient and give you the opportunity to accept and reject changes at will. There's quite a bit that can be done to tighten and shorten sentences without changing content, but will await your response before doing anything more.Pebblicious (talk) 08:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for your response. Since the page is blocked from editing, I've posted suggested edits on the dicsussion page. Hopefully that's correct. I'll read and get familiar with the Wiki process for editing, but learn more from jumping right into the process and I'd love to see this page classified as excellent! Cheers. Pebblicious (talk) 22:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

turkish football teams

hey I've noticed that you are interested in football and you like to contribute in wikipedia so that made me send this message :) I'm thinking of nominating fenerbahçe, galatasaray and beşiktaş articles for GA but I am confused... I've looked at some GA's and they are not better than ours.... Can we win what do you think? --Alex20fb (talk) 02:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sting Desert Rose.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sting Desert Rose.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ekşi Sözlük

Üyeliğin onaylanmış. Tebrikler. Kerem Özcan (talk) 12:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sağol, geç olsun güç olmasın :) Deliogul (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Faithlesssalvameacd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Faithlesssalvameacd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1453_conquest2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1453_conquest2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:4murat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4murat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

slm.

Merhaba, senin yaptiklarini cok gordum ve cok hayranim :). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Armenian_Genocide_deniers

Ben bunu speedy deletion olarak aldim, ama hic Turk bir Administrator tanimiyorum. Acaba biris yardim edebilirmi bu iste?

Ben cok kisiyi tanimiyorum wikiprojede, ama cok kez goruyorumki, benim kadar cok Ermeni soykirim propagandaya karsi savasan az kisiyi goruyorum. Hadi gorusuruz, (lutfen ama Turkce cevap birakma talk page'de, ben Turkum gibi bir imaj vermemeye calisiyorum, oylecene Turklere daha cok yardim edebilirim). — ^talk § _Arsenic99_ 06:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

onceki link yanlisti...

[1] Biraz yardim ederseniz burdaki link'te, cok sevinirim! Iyi gunler! — ^talk § _Arsenic99_ 17:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I spoke Turkish. FYI. I added another category for deletion. In case if you want to reconsider your vote. VartanM (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me translate for you, if my Turkish is good enough (I dont use Turkish chars either): Hi, I really like what you've done so far in other articles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Armenian_Genocide_deniers

I added this to speedy deletion but I do not know any administrators who can direct me properly. Can someone help me put this in the appropriate category.

I don't know many people in the wikiproject (either Armenian or Turkish) who might be interested in this category for discussion, but I find that propaganda dealing with the Armenian Genocide is quite a lot and few can deal with it if it is considered propaganda. (Btw I'm not really Turkish)

Sorry the previous link is wrong

[2] If you can please discuss what you know here in this link I would be pleased, good day:

--- End of message ---

So please do not assume that I was violating Wikipedia:Canvassing, since I didn't say that I wanted him to vote one way or another, I never said "please say delete" or "please vote delete" which in Turkish is "umarim delete dersiniz", "umarim delete oy verirsiniz", though the Turkish word for delete is "silmek" "sil" (which you won't find in this message; you can look it up).

I do think it is not a violation of Wikipedia:Canvassing to simply suggest a CfD to a wikipedian who declares in his userpage that he was Interested in the Ottoman Empire history. — ^talk § _Arsenic99_ 19:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't go into a fight in my talk page. If you will feel better, I would always say "delete" when it comes to pro-Genocide statements, regardless of other people's wishes. Take care folks, Deliogul (talk) 09:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cevdet_Sunay.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cevdet_Sunay.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 14:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Menderes Time Magazine.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Menderes Time Magazine.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Celal_Bayar.GIF

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Celal_Bayar.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Fevzicakmak.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fevzicakmak.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for an Alternative to Democracy

Surely he's not directly responsible of Al- Queda and such groups but indirectly he is. Let me try to explain my point of view. He interrupted the religous revolution which could affect all the islamic world back then. If we think(actually already known), Al-Queda founded by CIA against communism, I cannot stop thinking that if islamic revolution in Turkey would be completed, would there be really that much foundamentalist supporters of groups like Al-Queda? Or people,muslims, would understand the islamic view in a better way and foundamentalists could be replaced by modern-soft islamic people?

The person who wrote the above piece sounds as one of the remnants of the old guard in Turkey, who believe that the democratic process, whereby the people of each country decide as to who will run that country thru a democratic election, is not correct and that the military and civilian bureucrats should run the affairs of that country, just like in the old days of their "Milli Sef" (National Chief), before Menderes was elected in the first democratic election in Turkey, on May 14, 1950. Unfortunately, 58 years after those first free elections, we still have these people in Turkey, who are hoping that there would be another military coup d'etat, so that they can cling to power, against the wishes of the people they want to govern.

The reason they hate Adnan MENDERES is because he has proved to the people in Turkey that they are free to "elect" their own leaders, rather than accepting a self-appointed leader who has come to that position with guns in his hands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.101.70.19 (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it would affect the Arab world too much, but we should not speculate so much, many things might have happened. Anyway, Al-Quaeda started because 'the infidels' (US, UK) set foot on the 'holy lands' (Arabia, not necessarily Mecca). That is what Bin Laden had been telling to his followers. Check Salafism and Wahhabism. 21:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

85.101.70.19, I think your comment is subjective because these are your ideas about the true path for Turkey and your understanding of the term "democracy". I guess you would be shocked if I would say that democracy is just the dictatorship of the poor/commons and one of the worst governing types around. When stating such directly, you can find it unacademic or sick but this is one of the main arguments of Aristotle. I hope you understood my point. Deliogul (talk) 21:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Deliogul, Aristotle lived a few thousands years ago. I assume that you will admit that humanity has progressed since that time. I hope and assume that Turks have also progressed, since they seem to have "judicial coup d'etats" now (as reported in Newsweek two weeks ago), rather than the military coup d'etats. Hopefully the "young Turks" (or maybe I should say the "young officers") have also learned from experience that every time they depose a popularly elected Prime Minister, an even more religious fellow is elected by the Turkish people in the following free elections. Menderes was an attorney-at-law and a graduate of American College in Izmir; after he was hanged in 1961 by the "young officers", Demirel (who was more pious) was elected in 1965: He is from Isparta, a civil engineer and a graduate of Afyon High. After Demirel was deposed and banned from politics in 1980, Ozal (who was much more pious than the previous two) was elected in 1983: he was an electrical engineer and a graduate of Kayseri High. After he died in 1993, Mr. Erbakan (a very religious man) won the 1995 elections; he was a mechanical engineering professor and from Konya. When he was deposed in a post-modern coup in 1997, the current PM, namely Mr. Tayyip Erdogan (a businessman and a graduate of an imam high school) was elected in 2003 from Siirt province, although he is originally from Rize. If he will be banned now (as expected by Newsweek and others), I can bet with you that a much more religious man from an even more eastern province will be elected in 2012 Presidential elections, at the latest. It is apparent and obvious that the more arm-wrestling that the "young officers" do with the Turkish people, the more they lose. They have to learn to obey the commands of the popular vote soon, hopefully before Turkey becomes either like North Korea or Iran. After all, they are the two possible alternatives to the democratic societies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.96.47.123 (talk) 16:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you say if democracy loses, either a religion freak authoritarian regime or a personality cult driven dictatorship will be established in Turkey. I'm totally opposing you in this sense. Also;

I. Actually, I'm not a fan of Aristotle but "time" is not a determinant in development. Therefore, one can't say that newer is better. Democracy being the way of modern people is just and assumption, not a fact.

II. Another thing; today democracy is generally used as an ideological tool in the hands of capitalists. In most of the cases, people are not equal but they manipulated in a way that they think they are equal. Maybe a "subjective source" but I offer you to read Vladimir Lenin’s “What Is to Be Done?” about the class consciousness. Lenin argues that democracy is a stage where the working class gets limited rights but system is built in such a way that they would be happy with the limited rights they have and wouldn’t harm the benefits of the capitalists more.

III. Both Lenin and Aristotle are in the VIP room of historical political thinkers but if you don’t like them both, I can’t do anything for you. Aristotle, in his work “Politics”, defined the basis of the practical state, the importance of the middle class and the notion of private property. He found out these variables centuries ago than John Locke but Aristotle only came out with different results than the optimistic liberalism of Locke. Once again, the time difference between their works is not important in determining which is “better”.

Your assumption about "if you don't like democracy than you want the military rule" is also far from academic understanding. Deliogul (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Şeriatçı şopar

"Hindistan'ın sağındaki" ülkeden gelip İngiltere'de yaşayan şeriatçı şopar Türkiye makalesini kendi ideolojisine göre şekillendirmek gayretinde. Bir ara "başka bir isimleyken" bana özel mesaj atmıştı, adam kalabalığa karşı "sakin bir tip" olarak kendini gösterse de, biraz üzerine gidince resmen hırs içine giriyor ve "siz laik Kemalistler bir gün tepetaklak gideceksiniz, az kaldı" türünden yorumlar yapıyor. Yani son derece sistematik, planlı ve bilinçli bir şekilde çalışıyor. Senden bu konuda (bu şeriatçı şoparı nötralize etme konusunda) bana destek olmanı rica ediyorum. Ben ise "Teoman şarkısı" malum kişiliğim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.17.137.44 (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey article

Hi there, just a notice on your edit on the article. In the religion section, it starts off by saying 'nominally', but why that word. It should be introduced to the readers in a positive type of fashion like many other articles '... the main religion' or 'predominantly' or '... largest religion'. This term or words, kind of some ways mean, 'although' or even 'unfortunately', I mean it just the way it sounds. So I have just changed it, to present it in a better way. Hope you understand, problems or questions hit back. Thanks. M Miah (talk) 19:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Gok Medresesi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Gok Medresesi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

 Ash_Crow (talk) 11:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baris Akarsu.jpg

This image has been speedily deleted as copyright infringement. We do not allow fair use images of living persons. It was licensed as cover art, however it was a promotional photo. Please do not upload any copyrighted images of living persons. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. My apologies. I've restored the image, but I still think it needs to be deleted. I have tagged it as needing a fair use rationale, but really I don't think it passes our non-free content criteria 1, thus rendering any rationale invalid. I've started a discussion on the image talk page about it. Basically, considering there is already a freely licensed image available and in use in the article, I don't believe there is a valid fair use claim to use a copyrighted image. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 13:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fahri Korutürk.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Fahri Korutürk.GIF. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:52, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Religion section of Turkey

Please add any comments or suggestions relating to the reversion of the Religion section at the talk page on Religion (2). Thanks! Mohsin (talk) 14:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-edited my version of the section, please add your comments on the Talk Page, whether you are in favor of my revision (hopefully), or the other after reviewing it, Thanks! Mohsin (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just added that info as you have requested to my version, so is my version more suitable for the article than the current? Thanks (reply on Talk:Turkey. Mohsin (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote at the Religion (2) section of Talk Page of the article Turkey, viewing Version 1 (my re-edited version for a neutral prospective) and Version 2, and decide which is the preferred version for the Religion section of Turkey at the below of the page, Agree or Disagree for Version 1, Thank you!!! Mohsin (talk) 15:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truth in Wiki

Please keep an eye on articles: Erich Feigl, Bitlis, Van, Kars, Erzurum, Armenia-Turkey Relations, and Van Resistance. Truth needs vigorous defense on these pages and many others unfortunately. Regards.--Murat (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Cyprus

A discussion in [[3]] continues. Maybe you will be interested. Kaygtr (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cevdet Sunay.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cevdet Sunay.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turgut Ozal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turgut Ozal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Komotini Incidents

Hi there is an article abnout Komotini Incidents with a different name: 1990 Komotini events.If you have enogh information about the topic please try to improve article. Thx--Abbatai (talk) 19:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Deliogul! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 493 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Ankaralı Namık - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ankaralı Turgut - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tayyip Erdogan gender equality remarks

Hi there. I've recently updated Tayyip Erdogan's Wiki page with his statements that "he does not believe in gender equality" and "all families must have at least three children" along with the criticism these remarks caused. However, even though I have cited multiple NPOV references, there are some ideologically-driven users who want to delete the passage no matter what. Please help. The relevant links are below. 212.253.32.195 (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Recep_Tayyip_Erdo.C4.9Fan_gender_equality_edit_war http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLPN#Edit_war_at_Recep_Tayyip_Erdo.C4.9Fan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan#Justice

Missing MPs

Hello, Deliogul. You have new messages at Talk:Turkish general election, 1973.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Help with some Turkish related stuff

Hi Deliogul. This guy said some sentences in a language that should be Turkish (he says he learnt Turkish and Arabic before English, though, as you'll see, he's not too reliable when it comes to his background).

Does any of these sentences have some resemblance with Turkish?:

What does he say to his father after "I believe in Jesus"...?
"Writen in a Kabul Mosque", I can say it's not Arabic. Even when Turkish is not spoken in Kabul, is there any similarity with Turkish (perhaps Uzbek?).

Teşekkürler! --Filius Rosadis (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fenerbahçe vs. Palermo.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fenerbahçe vs. Palermo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ekşi

Esenlikler, sözlükte hangi rumuzda yazıyorsunuz? ~~Hakan~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.55.19.46 (talk) 01:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal - a new scope for fascism task force

I have proposed a new scope for fascism task force. Please express your opinion in the task force's talk page. Thank you!

Sapere aude22 (talk) 16:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hasan Yılmaz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hasan Yılmaz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ankaralı Namık

The article Ankaralı Namık has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN singer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Simply Red - Holding Back the Years.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Simply Red - Holding Back the Years.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Festival (Kenan Doğulu album)

The article Festival (Kenan Doğulu album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there's nothing to this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rayman60 (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Çakkıdı

The article Çakkıdı has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

nothing to this article. no sources. very little info (especially verifiable through RSes). whatever is relevant can go into subject's main article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rayman60 (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ismail cem.jpg

The file File:Ismail cem.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sivas Districts.jpg

The file File:Sivas Districts.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cem_Sultan#Really_an_important_figure

If you really think that "conquering" (by force of weapons) is something desirable and admirable, then, please, think again!!
Do you really think that all these peoples which have been "conquered" are happy to have been conquerd?
Please ping me. Steue (talk) 04:14, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]