User talk:Eyatu Ben

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I don't understand why did you block me ? I wrote articles about Tunisia I am new member for 2 weeks. Why did you block me for no reason? I have no other account this is my only account ! --Eyatu Ben (talk) 12:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #30210 was submitted on 2020-04-21 13:26:14. This review is now closed.

-- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a member on Wikipedia for 2 weeks and I have written more than 25 articles for Tunisia my country, my goal is to have several articles on my country and become the best tunisian editor in Wikipedia. I have not used other accounts and chdondon is not me, I created several articles about my country including Metameur Ali Riahi Tamezret El Mdou Faïd Sidi Brahim Riahi Hachem Gaddouch Fatma Boussaha Chotrana Mahdia Marine Cemetery .... the topics i'm going to created about communes in Tunisia, artists, Historical figure and others. --Eyatu Ben (talk) 02:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyatu Ben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why this block what I did ? I have been a member on Wikipedia for 2 weeks and I have written more than 25 articles for Tunisia my country, my goal is to have several articles on my country and become the best tunisian editor in Wikipedia. I have not used other accounts and chdondon is not me, I created several articles about my country including Metameur Ali Riahi Tamezret El Mdou Faïd Sidi Brahim Riahi Hachem Gaddouch Fatma Boussaha Chotrana Mahdia Marine Cemetery .... the topics i'm going to created about communes in Tunisia, artists, Historical figure and others. If you are not agree please i would like to delete all my articles. These are my articles, I am the one who wrote all these articles and in the end I find myself blocked for no reason. Eyatu Ben (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once you make an edit to Wikipedia, it belongs to Wikipedia and cannot be removed just because the user who made edits requests it; you are told this above the publish changes button when you edit: "By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL." Your request does not address the reason for the block, sockpuppetry, the use of multiple accounts. If you have not done so, you will need to provide an explanation as to why we think you are. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tunisian YouTubers

A tag has been placed on Category:Tunisian YouTubers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chotrana

Hello, Eyatu Ben,

Thank you for creating Chotrana.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

All pages need multiple independent, reliable sources. Please add them.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 17:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samir Loussif moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samir Loussif, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abdelaziz Sfar

The article Abdelaziz Sfar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable sportsman

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 18:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samir Loussif

Hello, Eyatu Ben. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samir Loussif".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hedi Donia

Hello, Eyatu Ben. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hedi Donia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]