User talk:Neurorebel
Welcome!
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Neurorebel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polpettone di melanzane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry to say that your command of English is not sufficient to properly edit articles on the English Wikipedia. Please do not edit articles here any more, instead edit the Wikipedia of your native language. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- {u|Beyond My Ken} Thats sad but true, im not as fluent in English as I once was, neither as I believe myself. Obviously I use a more basic English at discussions in favor of celerity hence I ask that you judge me by my articles and not by my discussions. I have a clue that I understand English better than im understood, respective to this article Im almost done with it. --Neurorebel (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I have no objection to the inclusion of Garoto now that it has been bluelinked, if you wish to divide the list as you explained in the talk page I say go for it. Bakilas (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
In response
Hello. I read your message. You might want to go to either WP:Teahouse or WP:help desk. Either one can be more helpful. Ask me any questions if you will. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I see you did one month ago. Maybe both pages will help: Wikipedia:Speakers of other languages and Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language. --George Ho (talk) 23:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Maybe Wikipedia:Tutorial or Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia would do. BTW, there is Simple English Wikipedia, which has a welcome page. I'll respond to you about your writing soon please. --George Ho (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
– About what you wrote at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 55#Hello my name is Neurorebel (moved from policy subpage), your English is okay grammatically. However, they may need some improvements, like the spelling and the structure. The typing skills might need some improvements. I see you have posted messages at Wikiversity, so you can go to some course pages. There is v:Computer Skills/Fundamentals/Typing, where you can learn typing. There are also v:English and b:Subject:English language. I don't know which article you referred to or would refer to. Nonetheless, your skills at List of candies are decent. That's just my thoughts. --George Ho (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
– Thanks for responding again. About the "momentary permission", I don't think such permission is needed unless you either couldn't edit a locked (protected) article or are banned from editing one article or articles related to one topic. However, better to discuss before editing. "Help:Editing" and "Help:Referencing for beginners" might help. Also, about "User:Neurorebel/sandbox/cuisine" ([1]), if you think it's ready, you might want to press the blue button saying "Submit your draft for review!" If you like to create newer articles, see Wikipedia:Your first article. You can also use Wikipedia:Articles for creation. --George Ho (talk) 05:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
– Actually, no. You're not topic-banned. A ban must be initiated by a community or an Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) or an administrator. BMK hasn't proposed a topic ban (yet). Also, he is neither a member of ArbCom nor an admin. If you think ownership is a concern, you might want to read Wikipedia:Ownership of content. However, some of us, including yourself, are concerned about your English communication skills. I doubt there was ownership, but you can disagree if you want. By the way, there is WP:Editing policy, which benefits more. Also, you may want to read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which also applies to your situation. --George Ho (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
– Hello again. You have replies at WP:VPM. Please read them through, and you'll see good advices. Best, George Ho (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zabala (candy) (June 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zabala (candy) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Neurorebel,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Zabala (candy) has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Candel Astra (July 2)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Candel Astra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zabala (candy) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 21:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)WikiProject Latin music invitation
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal. |
Erick (talk) 15:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- What an honour!--Neurorebel (talk) 00:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Candel Astra concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Candel Astra, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Neurorebel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Candel Astra has been accepted
Candel Astra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Neurorebel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Coffea drinks has been nominated for discussion
Category:Coffea drinks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 13:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you just added "Catalán dulce" to list of Capsicum cultivars, but the reference you used ([2]) doesn't refer to anything with that name. It does reference "ají catalán", which I think is probably referring to the ají dulce, which is already in the list under the Capsicum chinense heading. Can you clarify please? Otherwise I'm going to remove it as unreferenced. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organic salt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Speedy deletion nomination of Musical systems
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Musical systems, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Water physics controversies has been nominated for discussion
Category:Water physics controversies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)