User talk:Silar

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Silar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --TimPope 10:43, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swital.jpg

haie Silar, could you tell why this image is GNUFDL? as it is from the polish government i dont belive, that they put images under GNUFDL. I posted a question as well on Wikipedia talk:Possibly unfree images#Image:Swital.jpg ...Sicherlich ^Post 07:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:NYT 1946 04 18.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NYT 1946 04 18.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 03:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice pics

The Galician oilfields (trail article).

Spelling in English

Hi Silar, please try to be a little more careful with your spelling and grammar in your English language articles. Also, please preview the articles before moving on. I've correct many mistakes, including missing commas, extra spaces between punctuation, and extra "=" signs before/after headings. Also, on articles about towns/villages, please keep the information relavent to an encyclopedia. Thanks, and keep up the good work creating new articles. --CapitalR 07:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Swital.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Swital.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Night Gyr 23:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:6PSPSambor.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:6PSPSambor.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 07:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dowodca2PSP.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:Dowodca2PSP.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dowodca2PSP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Galizisches Infantrie Regiment

It looks like your Galizisches Infantrie Regiment article is up for AfD. Would you be interested in addressing the concerns brought up in the discussion? Thanks. — RJH (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1PSPNowy Sacz.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1PSPNowy Sacz.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 06:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5PSPPrzemysl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5PSPPrzemysl.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 05:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nafta1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nafta1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrawa Wołoska

Hi. Would you know what was the Jewish population number before World War II in this town? This data is probably difficult to obtain, but at least an approximate percentage in relation to the general population? Thanks and happy new year! --Healkids 18:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Wappen SanokLand.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 13:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:3PSPBielsko.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3PSPBielsko.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:4PSPCieszyn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4PSPCieszyn.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrawa Wołoska

Greetings! Could you please clarify what it seems to be a discrepancy of dates, whereas the town was founded only in 1402 but it belonged to Poland since 966? b)Did Peter name it Tyravia or the town had that name already and he renamed to T-W? c)To what country (ies) did the town belong from 1018 to 1340? If you wish, you could reply here and I'll help you write the clarification. Thank you for great contributions. Best!--Healkids 14:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I made some changes in the article, kindly take a look and make corrections as you see fit. A map of Poland should also be inserted, showing the location of the village in it..we could copy the one that is in the Tyrawa Wołoska Polish article, would you please do it? Best regards! --Healkids 17:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrazek http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:TatryWysokie1.jpg nie przedstawia Tatr Polskich, a Słowackie, a konkretnie Krzyżne Liptowskie, Skrajny i Zadni Goły Wierch w masywie Kop Liptowskich. Tak gwoli ścisłości :)--83.12.91.242 (talk) 20:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CoATyrawyWoloskiej.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CoATyrawyWoloskiej.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Bieszczady

Your photos of Bieszczady have been uploaded to Commons but they don't have informations where they've been taken. I'm cathegorizing the Bieszczady Mountains and I've no idea what to do with the following images:

Are you sure that they were taken in Bieszczady (not Sanocko-Turczańskie Mountains for example)? Do you remember what does the first picture show? Please answer at Wikimedia Commons or Polish Wikipedia. --ŁukaszWu (talk) 10:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Galicja1881.jpg

File:Galicja1881.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Galicja1881.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Galicja1881.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Folk Dance Ensemble Sanok

I'd like to thank you on behalf of WP:WikiProject Poland for writing the article about Folk Dance Ensemble Sanok. I'd also like to let you know that if you make the article a little bit longer, it might qualify to be on Wikipedia's front page as part of WP:Did you know. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Silar! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

— Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rymut.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rymut.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ERK.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ERK.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 12:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ostsiedlung, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kaszuby, Little Poland and Paradyż (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of the Germans in Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ruthenian, Szymbark, Gothic and Friedrich II

Lesser Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ruthenian, San and Szymbark

Central Beskidian Piedmont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rożnów

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 30 DOY page

Recently you edited the June 30 DOY page and left the event in a bit of disarray. Please in the future, list each event seperately even if they relate to the same year. Please don't try to group multiple events into one. You listed:

1941 – World War II: Operation Barbarossa – what happened? did it begin, did it end, did they start planning it?
- – Lviv (Ukraine), as part of the 1st Brandenberg Battalion, the first soldiers of the Nachtigall Battalion entered Lviv; Declaration of Ukrainian Independence by Yaroslav Stetsko of Ukrainian government; first Lviv pogrom;

Perhaps you can take a moment prior to editing to see how the rest of the page is formatted, or if you did do that, perhaps you might try previewing your edit before saving it. Leaving it in the manner you did does mean someone will have to re-edit your edit. Thanks Ken Tholke 05:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kentholke (talk • contribs)

Copyright violations

Will you please stop restoring blatant copyright violations at History of the Germans in Poland? It's bad enough you put them in there in the first play (originally unattributed until I started tagging suspicious looking sentences with cn tags - hence, not just copyright violations, but straight up plagiarism) but restoring them once someone points out that they're copyright violations is gonna land you in trouble pretty quick.

Moge powtorzyc po Polsku jesli to pomoze.VolunteerMarek 10:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

przypis jest podany do tekstu, to nie plagiat.

I can repite it in English [[User:Silar|Volunteer<font

Przypis NIE byl podany dopoki sie o niego nie upomnialem. I dalej jest slowo w slowo to samo co w sourcie - co jest copyright violation. Patrz WP:COPYVIO.

(There was no source given until I asked for it. And even then it's a word for word copy of the source - which is a copyright violation. See WP:COPYVIO).VolunteerMarek 10:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you revert one more time, given that these are copyright violations, I will report you to WP:3RR for edit warring. Note that removing copyright violations is exempt from the 3RR rule, especially when they're this blatant.

Jesli jeszcze raz zrewertujesz, poniewaz to sa copyright violations, podam raport na 3RR. Zauwaz, ze usuwanie copyright violations nie podpada pod 3RR, szczegolnie jak jest az tak oczywiste.VolunteerMarek 10:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: [1].VolunteerMarek 11:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature issues

Hello. I have not yet looked into the copyright concerns, as requested, but am coming by to let you know that your signature on my talk page is a problem. Your signature is meant to represent your account and should not be manipulated to resemble that of another editor, as you did here. See WP:Signature forgery. Please don't do this anymore. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations, edit warring, and disruption. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herb Gozdawa.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herb Gozdawa.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CoATyrawyWoloskiej.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CoATyrawyWoloskiej.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 09:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Silar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Silar~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Satellite image of Nowotaniec.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Satellite image of Nowotaniec.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MalopolskaWschodnia.jpg

The file File:MalopolskaWschodnia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Szematyzm 1872 .jpg

The file File:Szematyzm 1872 .jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, text-only file, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]