Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celtic RFC, South Canterbury, NZ

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic RFC, South Canterbury, NZ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not state notability. It is clearly not a notable club. Charlie the Pig (talk) 01:13, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm not seeing much here. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real claim to notability made, a minor amateur team from what I can tell. The fact that neither of the competitions in which the club competes have articles is telling. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable cruft. Quis separabit? 19:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.