Crunch

Golfer Infobox

I made this userbox and first put it on Tiger Woods's page with a font size of 87% on Nov 24 2006. For all other golfers, I've used 85%. As for the width of the box, I've adjusted it so that the major championship years can all fit in one line. Therefore, the box width varies with each golfer. I didn't like the idea of a set size for the infobox, which is part of the reason why I made this one. Notice Jack Nicklaus's is the widest because I had to fit 6 years in one row, but maintained 1 row for each major, which I believe looks cleaner than if it were in multiple rows. But I digress. Essentially, I suggest keeping the major championship section's years all in 1 line, and let that determine your length. Thanks for the tip about Ernie Els. If that doesn't go over well, we'll have some talk page discussing to do. Cheers. Supertigerman 23:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Seon Hwa Leee - stub class?

I copy and pasted the stub class from another page and forgot to change it.! It should I think be a start class going by the criteria. I've made the change. As for importance we have no guidelines to go on so I used the following logic for sorting female golfers:-
Annika Sorenstam and Kathy Whitworth are obviously Top class given their careers.
Pioneers such as Louise Suggs are probably High Class as are winners of the main year end awards e.g Karrie Webb who I didn't classify as I made contributions to her article.
Veteran golfers with multiple wins are probably Mid class e.g Dottie Pepper and Dale Reid.
Seon Hwa Lee has an ROY and 6 professional wins but I felt needed a few more wins or a few more years to be classed as Mid hence it had to be Low.

Any thoughts on how we might determine importance other than my personal logic?

Nicole Castrale

I regard you as the go-to guy for LPGA articles. Will you help flesh out the (new) Nicole Castrale stub? I watch golf, you live it, thus I place my trust in you. Zzorse 00:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

You are very kind. Zzorse 12:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Ms. Castrale's image is under threat of deletion [1] . Any ideas on how to encourage someone to step forward and contribute their own photo for the article? In your opinion, is it fair to say a free image can not be reasonably found or created at this time? Zzorse 02:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Golf Newsletter

The WikiProject Golf Newsletter Issue IV - May 2007 If you would like to improve our future newsletters, go to our newsletter page.

Project News I am experimenting with a new layout for easy readability, as well as to make the newsletter look more attractive and more like other ones. If someone feels it could be better, go right ahead and change it. The newsletter page is right here. An assessment department has been set up. To find out how to assess an article, go to the assessment page. I have asked Snowolf if his bot could help in tagging articles. The response is still pending, but hopefully we will soon have more of an idea of how many articles we have. During the two months since the last newsletter, Annika Sorenstam has reached good article status. Congratulations to all who worked on this article. There has been a recent peer review for Jack Nicklaus. Please help by following the suggestions that are shown here. A new sidebar has been created. If you think it could be improved, go here. Several new templates have been created. Go to the templates page for a full list. Article Statistics Golf articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA A 1 1 GA 2 2 B 10 1 11 Start 30 3 2 6 1 42 Stub 11 3 11 73 2 100 Assessed 54 6 13 80 3 156 Unassessed 0 0 0 0 1269 1269 Total 54 6 13 80 1272 1425 New Members Welcome to all the new members over the past two months! Golfer45 Crunch Mudforce Alexander Phipps Fuzzy14 AdamKostrich Bones999 Mets Bu b0y2007 Richard B Christophee

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

DYK

On 30 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marilee Jones, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 20:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

2006 Number Ones for deletion

Don't change or erase other people's votes on deletion discussions, like you did to mine. Actions like that are considered vandalism and can get you blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Atlan 20:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)