Talk:Shnorrer

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wik (talk | contribs) at 20:23, 9 February 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Any hope of reaching a consensus here? Or maybe following the 3-revert rule? Pakaran. 04:44, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)

There is no need to list Karl Schnörrer on this page since his name is spelt differently from Shnorrer, therefore disambiguation is not needed. Maximus Rex 04:47, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)

It's confusingly similar, I think a note should be there. But let's see what happens with the vfd first. Anthony DiPierro 04:48, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Why is this page protected? To make absolutely sure it cannot be expanded or otherwise improved? <KF> 18:52, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Because any troll can provoke an edit war on any page he wants, and have the page semi-permanently protected. --Wik 19:37, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)
Sorry, Wik, I don't understand your answer. <KF> 19:44, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Edit war. --Wik 19:52, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)
Okay, I've gone through the whole edit history one by one, and all I can say is that the two (three?) of you are behaving like three year olds. And this is not meant as a compliment ("unspoiled by adulthood" or whatever). If an edit war is about controversial subjects such as abortion, Palestine or freedom fries, that's bad but understandable. But this?
And by the way, it's sepArate. <KF> 20:16, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
It is indeed not understandable why trolls like Anthony are given a free rein here. --Wik 20:23, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)