Elizabeth Morgan Act

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Emact (talk | contribs) at 22:59, 9 December 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Elizabeth Morgan Act was an act of Congress, as a rider, on behalf of Elizabeth Morgan. This was a second act of Congress in which Morgan's case was mentioned during the deliberations. The first had been a modification of local D.C. law. The act allowed Morgan and her daughter, Ellen, to return to the United States without having to share custody of Ellen with the girl's father, Dr. Eric A. Foretich. The act was overturned only after Ellen had reached adulthood.

By 1995, Morgan who had fled to New Zealand with her daughter, Ellen, had developed cancer. Ellen, then 13, indicated to Rep. Thomas M. Davis that she wanted to return to the U.S. In September 1996, Davis sponsored the Elizabeth Morgan Act as a rider on a major transportation bill. While this new legislation was worded to focus on Ellen's needs, it effectively shielded Morgan from all of the judicial custody orders that were still in force, and they returned to the U.S in 1997.

Foretich claimed that the damage to his reputation from the Act reduced his professional practice in the D.C. area and made it difficult for him to find comparable work anywhere else in the nation. He dropped all further attempts to gain visitation and focused on the undoing of the Act. On December 16, 2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit ruled that the Elizabeth Morgan Act was an unconstitutional, as a rare bill of attainder, but the decision was moot as Ellen was no longer a minor.

Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor who represented the Foretich family, said the government will have to pay for legal fees in the case—about $1 million. He added, "I would hope this would be the final chapter, but such hopes have been dashed many times in the case." He also said in a USA Today editorial in March 2005): "The bill negated 10 years of orders in the husband's favor and effectively labeled him a danger to his daughter."

Comparisons regarding congressional intervention in the judicial system can be drawn between the Elizabeth Morgan Act and the Palm Sunday Compromise of the recent Terri Schiavo conflict.


Congressional Record and Court case

The deliberation of both Acts are listed in detail to demonstrate how prominently Morgan's case was mentioned during the deliberations.

Press coverage


General Press

References by Men/Women web sites