Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mages Guild

The Mages Guild, The Arena Guild, The Fighters Guild, The Dark Brotherhood, The Thieves Guild

Guilds for online MMORPG, delete  J\/\/estbrook   Talk  VSCA    04:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment- Actually, they are guilds in a single player PC/Xbox 360 game yet to be released. That barely helps the case for keeping them though. VegaDark 05:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment you missed two guilds in the same series, which I added above. -- Megamix^? 05:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks  J\/\/estbrook   Talk  VSCA    06:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, unsalvageably incoherent. Gazpacho 11:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non Notable.Obina 12:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Gotta whack 'em all! I choose YOU!  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 14:14, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Destruction. ' ^{I can't click that!} _contribs 15:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 17:01, January 2, 2006 (UTC)
• Other than the arena guild, they're all present in Daggerfall and Morrowind, as well as Oblivion. The articles as they stand, though, are an incoherent attempt at a game guide. Even if cleaned up, at best they would belong on Wikibooks, but there's no need to transwiki content as poor as this. Delete (and also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Brotherhood). —Cryptic (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - These subjects are notable enough for a wikipedia article. These are major factions which have played a large part in the Elder Scrolls universe. We have articles for some of the races of the series, like Dwemer, so if these articles were of reasonable quality, I'd definitely vote keep. The Elder Scroll series of games have a very rich history, there are literally pages and pages of texts within the games, most of it is lore and background detail. One could build up a very comprehensive article on each of the guids mentioned here. It is a shame that these articles really aren't very good, but I really don't think they should have been lumped together in an AFD like this. I mean, the article on The Dark Brotherhood is actually coherent, and so is The Thieves Guild, however, the other three by User:Daedric Prince are not. So Keep those 2, and delete the rest. - Hahnchen 02:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The content is very bad, but the topics are as notable as any other game elements. -- jaredwf 07:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I rewrote The Dark Brotherhood and The Mages Guild, partially rewrote The Fighters Guild and The Thieves Guild, but The Arena Guild cannot be rewrote since it has not been in previous games. -- jaredwf 08:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - If the consensus is to delete, here are some other factions with articles: House Telvanni, House Hlaalu, House Redoran, House Dagoth, and Morag Tong. -- jaredwf 09:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep only if they are in game elements. I can't really tell at this point. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as gamer guild vanity. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 07:12, Jan. 4, 2006