This should not be classified in Wikipedia, since WP is a 'systemic' resource and as such appears to be against the ideals of the LARC.
If anything it should be filed under a different, completely unrelated and hard to find name.
--Dunk 13:15, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
How useful.
The buildings puropose does seem to be to help people carry out various prjects and what not, as such it's a practical one. Datepalm17 10:01, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
- The library at LARC is experiencing a fresh start and is free from the tyranny of structurelessness that the oxymoronic anti-systemic library imposed! NickW 22:59, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
i have changed "collectively run" to "run by a limited company". NickW, a former director should be able to verify this. Paki.tv
It is very debatable about whether WP is a systemic resource! It is a very POV to suggest that WP is systemic!#
---
I've put a POV warning as NickW's edits are not neutral! Paki.tv 18:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- 1)How am I not neutral? 2)How are you neutral? 3)Who's got the axe to grind? NickW 19:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)