The Talk:Surrealism discussion page has been archived 9 times.
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 1 - until Sep 17 2004
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 2 - until Sep 28 2004
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 3 - until Oct 13 2004
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 4 - until Nov 11 2004
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 5 - until Jan 25 2005
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 6 - until Aug 06 2005
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 7 - until Sep 03 2006
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 8 - until Sep 29 2006
- Talk:Surrealism/Archive 9 - until Mar 03 2007
If you wish to reply to something that was said in an archived comment, please copy the relevant text to the current talk page rather than editing the archives.
Topic
The topic of Talk:Surrealism is the wikipedia Surrealism article, and how we can improve it. This is not the place to copy and paste lengthy texts or engage in arguments about non-wikipedia topics. Thank you for cooperating.
Definitions
Daniel, can you explain what you mean with this edit? We're writing the encyclopedia article about this, remember? What encyclopedia are you quoting from? Having an "encyclopedia definition" in the middle of an encyclopedia article doesn't sound right. ~leif ☺ HELO 21:16, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Cleanup / Call for Help
This whole article is a mess. It's unorganized and full of contradictory claims. It's pathetic that something more coherent hasn't come out of the months of edits here. I'm tempted to list this on Cleanup to get some more assistance clarifying and organizing it. Any objections? Does anybody think this article doesn't need to be reorganized? It's quite frustrating how certain non-logged-in users insist on adding poorly written sentences to the end of seemingly random paragraphs. Even if these contributions weren't hopelessly POV (and they usually are), they would still need to be rewritten to approach wikipedia standards. I think an increased number of experienced editors here would be helpful. ~leif ☺ HELO 21:16, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)