Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common themes on Uncyclopedia

List of common themes on Uncyclopedia

A fancruftish list and an indiscriminate collection of information. I have absolutely no problem with including an article on Uncyclopedia, but I fail to see the point in creating an article on site-specific memes. Are we going to do this for every single website in cyberspace? Wikipedia may not be paper, but we should take care to keep the signal-to-noise ratio somewhere beyond microscopic. What's next? List of common slang terms among sophomores at Peoira Southern H.S.? I can't see why anyone would want this article. If they wanted to know more about Uncyclopedia, they'd visit the website. Moreover, this page is just begging to become a vanity clearinghouse, and probably already is. Starry Eyes 07:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. Starry Eyes 07:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OR. -- Koffieyahoo 07:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hopeless. Kill it now before other websites want similar "lists". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I dont see this as vanity, In fact I have found this article useful, but only in understanding uncyclopedia memes. Could it possibly be stipped down and merged with the Uncyclopedia article? --Amists 11:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Who has written about these themes? Where has the research on the thematic content of Uncyclopedia, upon which a Wikipedia article can be based, already been done? What source is being used? How is this not original research? Uncle G 12:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. —dima ^/sb.tk/ 15:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Excessively original research. Wickethewok 15:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research. Gazpacho 16:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete before List of YTMND fads reappears. Danny Lilithborne 17:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OR. Piccadilly 18:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with Amist's merge sentiment above, but as there are worries about OR, I guess I'll leave it be. However, I did userfy the page to myself (sans the fair use images, which could still go in the uncyclopedia article) because I think it's too cool to lose forever. Sad that the public won't be able to see it anymore.--Kchase T 18:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge most important themes to Uncyclopedia article. We have a list of Fark cliches in the main Fark article: why remove this entire list when some of it can be effectively and usefully merged? — Dark Shikari ^talk/_contribs 00:20, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to the main Uncyclopedia entry. -- Selmo 21:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]