This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles
Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments1 person in discussion
The recent edits by an IP eliminated almost all the references from the article. Per WP:V this is unacceptable. Every fact, every sentence, should have a citation to an external reliable source. Citing Wikipedia itself is not how it works. Further, it was written in outline format with everything in bullet points. We try to write in prose not bullets see WP:PROSE. Finally it seemed to eliminate text for no apparent reason while adding new text that looks promotional, about its new products. All of this appeared to me as COI editing by someone who is not experienced with Wikipedia. Unless something is sourced to a reliable source, it can't be trusted as accurate, or an accurate reflection of due WP:WEIGHT of coverage. -- GreenC02:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Same thing happened again. Whoever is editing this article appears to want to eliminate reliable sources, perhaps make it look like a candidate for deletion? Or a really bad attempt at promotion? -- GreenC21:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
