Luke193

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gargabook for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shovon (talk) 12:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

What am I blocked, why! I have not vandalised and I have certainly not been a Sock puppet and a heap of the other guys you have on there, I dont know why Im a sockpuppet to them!--Luke193 (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
    • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
    • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
    • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
    • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.

• Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Same reason as above, me being Australian of-course I will edit Australian pages and also I have devoted time to cleanup articles and remove over-praise --Luke193 (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

:You have been confirmed by checkuser as a sockpuppet of Gargabook (talk · contribs), so the "second chance" templates you have added do not apply here. You must make any unblock application on the Gargabook account, but first you should read the WP:Guide to appealing blocks. JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Umm yeah normally I would do that IF I was Gargabook and IF I knew his password!!!!!!--Luke193 (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

{{adminhelp|can an Admin just investigate this whole thing because I've been banned from this service because I'm apparently another person but I'm not!!! it's really annoying, I have NOT done anything wrong (i.e. Vandalism etc) and I have certainly not abused multiple accounts!!--Luke193 (talk) 23:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)}}

And the stuff on my user page was removed, I think the Admin used that as evidence (i.e. the guy has no user page so he is a phony) I saw it somewhere!!--Luke193 (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

And the guy said that I've ONLY edited India and Australia articles but this is false!!--Luke193 (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Can you explain your relation to The situation chalmers (talk · contribs) and Australian Intelligence101 (talk · contribs)? It appears you are editing from the same computer on the same ISP range. TNXMan 16:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Admin cannot investigate this account - we do not have enough powers. I have highlighted the important text above in bold. For blocks confirmed by checkuser you will have to appeal to the Arbitration Committee - the e-mail address is on Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)