Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela's Christmas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The comments lean to Keep but given the limited participation and few sources surfaced, I don't see a clear consensus here, and it has already been relisted twice. RL0919 (talk) 04:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Angela's Christmas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short film which does not pass WP:NFILM. Press is simply on sites which are like TV Guide, or Leonard Maltin's guides. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is valid because it has references from Decider and Hot Press. Thornstrom (talk) 11:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ugh. I don't know. There is the coverage of the movie on Decider [1], but that is the only reliable WP:SIGCOV I was able to find (there is also The Daily Free Press review at [2], but it is a student paper]. Besides that, I am finding WP:ROUTINE announcements of it launching or the multiple same posts on different websites linking twitter users' reception. Some passing mentions at The New Zealand Herald [3], Time (magazine) [4], Zimbio (a branch of Livingly Media) [5], and Los Angeles Times [6]. Unless someone find more in-depth sources about the movie, I am voting delete. There is a WP:ATD redirect possibility at List of original films distributed by Netflix, but this isn't a Netflix Original, they just have distribution rights. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I am seeing a reasonable amount of coverage in otherwise reliable/mainstream print sources (for example the pieces in The Times [7] and the Irish Independent [8]) to suggest that GNG is met. I would note that much of the coverage was almost certainly precipitated by the studio's PR effort around the several Daytime Emmy and Emile Awards nominations. But there would seem to be enough of it to warrant a keep. It's not overwhelming. Hence "weak".... Guliolopez (talk) 13:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:22, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.